Sustainability assessment of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with polyester reinforcement layers

The paper is focused on sustainability assessment of idealized geosynthetic reinforced soil walls constructed with polyester reinforcement layers using the MIVES multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Sustainability assessments cover environmental, economic, and social/functional components. In this study, the influence of different facing element types (precast concrete panels, welded wire mesh, and dry-cast concrete blocks) and different backfill materials (high-quality granular material, recycled concrete aggregate, and locally available soils with medium to low fines content) on sustainability rankings is investigated. Overall, no significant differences are observed between facing alternatives. Sustainability assessment scorings with precast concrete panels are slightly more favorable for lower walls, while dry-cast concrete blocks are slightly more favorable for taller walls. The use of locally available soils proved to be the most economic, environmentally friendly, and overall, the most sustainable alternative amongst the backfill soil options investigated, even when these soils have less mechanical strength. Total cost and global warming potential estimation charts for reinforced soil walls of different heights are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosynthetics International
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.25.00085
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability assessment of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with polyester reinforcement layers

A. Moncada, S. Olivella, I. P. Damians, R. J. Bathurst
Geosynthetics International
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Sustainability assessment of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with polyester reinforcement layers

A. Moncada, S. Olivella, I. P. Damians, R. J. Bathurst
article en

Abstract

The paper is focused on sustainability assessment of idealized geosynthetic reinforced soil walls constructed with polyester reinforcement layers using the MIVES multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Sustainability assessments cover environmental, economic, and social/functional components. In this study, the influence of different facing element types (precast concrete panels, welded wire mesh, and dry-cast concrete blocks) and different backfill materials (high-quality granular material, recycled concrete aggregate, and locally available soils with medium to low fines content) on sustainability rankings is investigated. Overall, no significant differences are observed between facing alternatives. Sustainability assessment scorings with precast concrete panels are slightly more favorable for lower walls, while dry-cast concrete blocks are slightly more favorable for taller walls. The use of locally available soils proved to be the most economic, environmentally friendly, and overall, the most sustainable alternative amongst the backfill soil options investigated, even when these soils have less mechanical strength. Total cost and global warming potential estimation charts for reinforced soil walls of different heights are provided.

Geosynthetics International
International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (ES), FC Barcelona (ES), Royal Military College of Canada (CA), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.