A nationwide population-based cohort study of hospital academic status and survival following colorectal cancer surgery in Finland 1987–2016

There is a lack of evidence regarding hospital academic status and survival following colorectal cancer surgery and there is a paucity of data from European countries. The aim of this study was to investigate this association between hospital academic status and mortality after colon and rectal cancer surgery. All 49 032 patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer in years 1987-2016 in Finland were included, with complete follow-up until December 31, 2019. Primary outcome was all-cause 5-year mortality. Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in academic and non-academic hospitals for colorectal surgery, adjusted for calendar period, age, sex, comorbidity, stage, tumor location and oncological therapy. Additionally, colon and rectal cancer surgery were assessed separately. Total colectomies were included in the study, and the cancer location was based on the first location information that was reported by the cancer registry or in the ICD code if not reported in the cancer registry. The manuscript was written according to Equator network guidelines. Compared to academic hospitals, the patients operated in non-academic hospitals had a slightly increased 5-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.11) and also the 30-day and 90-day mortality was increased in patients operated in non-academic hospitals. Sensitivity analysis including only patients operated with confirmed curative intent suggested no differences between academic and non-academic hospitals in colorectal cancer for 5-year all-cause mortality or in 5-year cancer specific mortality, respectively. In analysis including hospital volume as an explanatory covariate, the increase in 5-year mortality in non-academic hospitals compared to academic hospitals was stronger than in main analysis. A pre-planned subgroup-analysis stratified by cancer type (colon, or rectal) suggested a slightly decreased 5-year all-cause mortality in academic institutions for rectal but not for colon cancer surgery. Hospital academic status is associated with slightly improved 5-year mortality in colorectal cancer surgery, but benefits of centralization to academic hospitals may be limited to rectal cancer surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38347-4
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A nationwide population-based cohort study of hospital academic status and survival following colorectal cancer surgery in Finland 1987–2016

Kai Klintrup, Pasi Ohtonen, Elise Sarjanoja, Joonas H. Kauppila
Scientific Reports
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

A nationwide population-based cohort study of hospital academic status and survival following colorectal cancer surgery in Finland 1987–2016

Kai Klintrup, Pasi Ohtonen, Elise Sarjanoja, Joonas H. Kauppila
article en

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence regarding hospital academic status and survival following colorectal cancer surgery and there is a paucity of data from European countries. The aim of this study was to investigate this association between hospital academic status and mortality after colon and rectal cancer surgery. All 49 032 patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer in years 1987-2016 in Finland were included, with complete follow-up until December 31, 2019. Primary outcome was all-cause 5-year mortality. Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in academic and non-academic hospitals for colorectal surgery, adjusted for calendar period, age, sex, comorbidity, stage, tumor location and oncological therapy. Additionally, colon and rectal cancer surgery were assessed separately. Total colectomies were included in the study, and the cancer location was based on the first location information that was reported by the cancer registry or in the ICD code if not reported in the cancer registry. The manuscript was written according to Equator network guidelines. Compared to academic hospitals, the patients operated in non-academic hospitals had a slightly increased 5-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.11) and also the 30-day and 90-day mortality was increased in patients operated in non-academic hospitals. Sensitivity analysis including only patients operated with confirmed curative intent suggested no differences between academic and non-academic hospitals in colorectal cancer for 5-year all-cause mortality or in 5-year cancer specific mortality, respectively. In analysis including hospital volume as an explanatory covariate, the increase in 5-year mortality in non-academic hospitals compared to academic hospitals was stronger than in main analysis. A pre-planned subgroup-analysis stratified by cancer type (colon, or rectal) suggested a slightly decreased 5-year all-cause mortality in academic institutions for rectal but not for colon cancer surgery. Hospital academic status is associated with slightly improved 5-year mortality in colorectal cancer surgery, but benefits of centralization to academic hospitals may be limited to rectal cancer surgery.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Päivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.