Comparative analysis of statistical downscaling methods for multi-model decadal climate predictions over Western Europe

Decadal climate predictions are a source of information to anticipate the evolution of the climate system on timescales from 1 to 10 years ahead. Since these predictions are often produced at coarser resolutions than ideal, statistical downscaling techniques can be employed to enhance their spatial resolution. This study assesses the effectiveness of various statistical downscaling methods applied to multi-model decadal predictions of mean near-surface air temperature and precipitation over Western Europe, for forecast years 1–5. The multi-model ensemble includes predictions from 13 forecasting systems (133 members) contributing to the Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). The performance of the different downscaling methods is evaluated against the high-resolution ERA5-Land reanalysis. Methods from Model Output Statistics (MOS) and Perfect Prognosis (PP) approaches are compared, which can be divided in four categories: (i) interpolations, (ii) calibrations, (iii) linear regressions and (iv) analogs methods. The results show that the skill estimates primarily depend on the calibration or linear regression approaches, with small differences from the interpolation method used during the downscaling. For temperature, raw model predictions already exhibit high skill, which is preserved when using calibrations or linear regressions using the own variable as predictor. However, skill tends to decrease when external predictors or analog methods are used. For precipitation, raw predictions generally show low skill and most downscaling methods offer little improvement. Nevertheless, analog approaches can increase skill in specific regions, highlighting their potential under certain conditions. • Interpolation methods achieve the highest performance for predictions of temperature. • Analog methods improve the skill of raw precipitation predictions over some regions. • The performance of some methods is region-dependent, especially for precipitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate Services
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2026.100639
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of statistical downscaling methods for multi-model decadal climate predictions over Western Europe

Eren Düzenli, Carlos Delgado‐Torres, Sara Moreno-Montes, Albert Soret et al.
Climate Services
Climate variability and models
article

Comparative analysis of statistical downscaling methods for multi-model decadal climate predictions over Western Europe

Eren Düzenli, Carlos Delgado‐Torres, Sara Moreno-Montes, Albert Soret, Raül Marcos-Matamoros, Núria Pérez-Zanón
article en

Abstract

Decadal climate predictions are a source of information to anticipate the evolution of the climate system on timescales from 1 to 10 years ahead. Since these predictions are often produced at coarser resolutions than ideal, statistical downscaling techniques can be employed to enhance their spatial resolution. This study assesses the effectiveness of various statistical downscaling methods applied to multi-model decadal predictions of mean near-surface air temperature and precipitation over Western Europe, for forecast years 1–5. The multi-model ensemble includes predictions from 13 forecasting systems (133 members) contributing to the Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). The performance of the different downscaling methods is evaluated against the high-resolution ERA5-Land reanalysis. Methods from Model Output Statistics (MOS) and Perfect Prognosis (PP) approaches are compared, which can be divided in four categories: (i) interpolations, (ii) calibrations, (iii) linear regressions and (iv) analogs methods. The results show that the skill estimates primarily depend on the calibration or linear regression approaches, with small differences from the interpolation method used during the downscaling. For temperature, raw model predictions already exhibit high skill, which is preserved when using calibrations or linear regressions using the own variable as predictor. However, skill tends to decrease when external predictors or analog methods are used. For precipitation, raw predictions generally show low skill and most downscaling methods offer little improvement. Nevertheless, analog approaches can increase skill in specific regions, highlighting their potential under certain conditions. • Interpolation methods achieve the highest performance for predictions of temperature. • Analog methods improve the skill of raw precipitation predictions over some regions. • The performance of some methods is region-dependent, especially for precipitation.

Climate ServicesVol. 42
Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.