Abstract PS4-11-27: Acceptability of a web-based narrative video intervention to promote clinical trial decision making among Black women with breast cancer

Abstract Background: Black women are more likely to present with advanced stage disease and to die following a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis compared with women from other racial and ethnic groups. This persistent health inequity is in part driven by underrepresentation in clinical trials (CTs), as well as structural and social drivers of health. Objective: The overall objective of this study is to develop, optimize, and pilot-test a narrative decision aid (web-based video) that is culturally sensitive, grounded in a socioecological framework, informed by in-depth, iterative, and community-engaged qualitative research, and designed to support clinical trial decision-making among Black breast cancer patients receiving care in safety-net oncology settings. Here, we report outcomes from an acceptability study conducted at a safety-net oncology practice among end-users. Methods: To assess acceptability of the web-based, narrative video intervention, we conducted a study in a clinic population at the University of Illinois Cancer Center oncology clinic. Black women with a diagnosis of BC (any stage, any point during treatment or follow-up) were identified by their oncologist and invited to participate,. Consenting participants completed a paper-based pre-survey, viewed the 12-minute video intervention on an electronic device, and completed a paper-based post-survey. The survey included items related to demographics, prior exposure to clinical trials, clinical trial knowledge, self-efficacy, and video acceptability. Participants received $50 for completing all study activities. Data were entered into a REDCap database and exported to SPSS for analysis. We calculated descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) for pre- and post-intervention scores and used paired t-tests to analyze the change in scores from pre- to post-intervention. Results: Twenty Black BC patients participated in the study. Prior to the intervention, 85% reported that a member of their medical team had discussed clinical trials, 75% had been invited to participate, and 60% had previously enrolled in a clinical trial. The correct response rate to 5 items on clinical trial knowledge increased from 85.8% at baseline to 92.0% post-viewing (p = 0.029). Confidence in making an informed decision about clinical trials also improved significantly. Self-efficacy was measured using an 11-item scale (0 = not at all confident; 4 = very confident); mean scores increased from 3.35 at baseline to 3.50 post-viewing (p < 0.001). At baseline, 75% of participants strongly agreed or agreed with the statement, “If I had the option, I would definitely consider joining a clinical trial;” this increased to 85% post-viewing. The video was highly acceptable: 100% of participants indicated they were extremely or somewhat likely to share it with family or friends; 95% would not change anything about the video; 80% reported it would motivate them or a loved one to speak with their doctor about clinical trials; and 80% found the content trustworthy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a culturally tailored, narrative-based video intervention is both acceptable to Black breast cancer patients and associated with improvements in clinical trial knowledge, decision-making self-efficacy, and intention to participate in trials. These findings support the feasibility of implementing such interventions in safety-net oncology settings. A pilot study of the intervention with a quasi-experimental design is ongoing and will evaluate whether integrating the intervention into standard education for newly diagnosed Black BC patients is associated with increase in clinical trial enrollment. Results of the pilot study will be presented. Citation Format: N. Hippalgaonkar, D. Patel, C. Hollahan, A. White, M. Carrasquillo, M. Karan, R. Warren, M. Kromm, G. Vass, P. Khosla, V. Henderson, K. Hoskins, L. Carnahan, R. Nguyen Acceptability of a web-based narrative video intervention to promote clinical trial decision making among Black women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-27.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-11-27
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-11-27: Acceptability of a web-based narrative video intervention to promote clinical trial decision making among Black women with breast cancer

Neha Hippalgaonkar, Ryan Huu-Tuan Nguyen, Kent Hoskins, Leslie R. Carnahan et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Abstract PS4-11-27: Acceptability of a web-based narrative video intervention to promote clinical trial decision making among Black women with breast cancer

Neha Hippalgaonkar, Ryan Huu-Tuan Nguyen, Kent Hoskins, Leslie R. Carnahan, Vida Henderson, Dev Patel, R. Warren, M. Kromm, C. Hollahan, P. Khosla, G. Vass, M. Karan, M. Carrasquillo, A. White
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Black women are more likely to present with advanced stage disease and to die following a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis compared with women from other racial and ethnic groups. This persistent health inequity is in part driven by underrepresentation in clinical trials (CTs), as well as structural and social drivers of health. Objective: The overall objective of this study is to develop, optimize, and pilot-test a narrative decision aid (web-based video) that is culturally sensitive, grounded in a socioecological framework, informed by in-depth, iterative, and community-engaged qualitative research, and designed to support clinical trial decision-making among Black breast cancer patients receiving care in safety-net oncology settings. Here, we report outcomes from an acceptability study conducted at a safety-net oncology practice among end-users. Methods: To assess acceptability of the web-based, narrative video intervention, we conducted a study in a clinic population at the University of Illinois Cancer Center oncology clinic. Black women with a diagnosis of BC (any stage, any point during treatment or follow-up) were identified by their oncologist and invited to participate,. Consenting participants completed a paper-based pre-survey, viewed the 12-minute video intervention on an electronic device, and completed a paper-based post-survey. The survey included items related to demographics, prior exposure to clinical trials, clinical trial knowledge, self-efficacy, and video acceptability. Participants received $50 for completing all study activities. Data were entered into a REDCap database and exported to SPSS for analysis. We calculated descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) for pre- and post-intervention scores and used paired t-tests to analyze the change in scores from pre- to post-intervention. Results: Twenty Black BC patients participated in the study. Prior to the intervention, 85% reported that a member of their medical team had discussed clinical trials, 75% had been invited to participate, and 60% had previously enrolled in a clinical trial. The correct response rate to 5 items on clinical trial knowledge increased from 85.8% at baseline to 92.0% post-viewing (p = 0.029). Confidence in making an informed decision about clinical trials also improved significantly. Self-efficacy was measured using an 11-item scale (0 = not at all confident; 4 = very confident); mean scores increased from 3.35 at baseline to 3.50 post-viewing (p < 0.001). At baseline, 75% of participants strongly agreed or agreed with the statement, “If I had the option, I would definitely consider joining a clinical trial;” this increased to 85% post-viewing. The video was highly acceptable: 100% of participants indicated they were extremely or somewhat likely to share it with family or friends; 95% would not change anything about the video; 80% reported it would motivate them or a loved one to speak with their doctor about clinical trials; and 80% found the content trustworthy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a culturally tailored, narrative-based video intervention is both acceptable to Black breast cancer patients and associated with improvements in clinical trial knowledge, decision-making self-efficacy, and intention to participate in trials. These findings support the feasibility of implementing such interventions in safety-net oncology settings. A pilot study of the intervention with a quasi-experimental design is ongoing and will evaluate whether integrating the intervention into standard education for newly diagnosed Black BC patients is associated with increase in clinical trial enrollment. Results of the pilot study will be presented. Citation Format: N. Hippalgaonkar, D. Patel, C. Hollahan, A. White, M. Carrasquillo, M. Karan, R. Warren, M. Kromm, G. Vass, P. Khosla, V. Henderson, K. Hoskins, L. Carnahan, R. Nguyen Acceptability of a web-based narrative video intervention to promote clinical trial decision making among Black women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-27.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Particulate Solid Research (United States) (US), Sinai Health System (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.