Abstract RF7-02: Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (EPIK-B5): Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

Abstract Background: Alpelisib (ALP), an α-specific PI3K inhibitor, plus fulvestrant (FUL) improved disease control with a manageable safety in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) harboring a PIK3CA-m in SOLAR-1 and in BYLieve Cohort A trials. We report primary results from the EPIK-B5 study, comparing ALP+FUL vs placebo (PBO)+FUL in men/postmenopausal women with PIK3CA-m HR+, HER2− ABC who had progressed on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i)+aromatase inhibitor (AI). Methods: EPIK-B5 was a phase 3, double-blind, PBO-controlled study. Pts (n=188) were randomised 1:1 to ALP+FUL (arm 1) or PBO+FUL (arm 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee [BIRC]. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), PFS by PIK3CA-m in baseline ctDNA, adverse events (AEs), time to definitive deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, change in global health status and symptom scale scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and time to progression on next line treatment or death (PFS2) by investigator assessment. Results: Baseline characteristics are shown in the Table. At primary analysis (data cutoff Oct 2024), median follow-up duration was 17.7 (1.4-33.1) months (mo). The median PFS (BIRC) was 7.4 and 2.8 mo in arm 1 and 2, respectively, (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37,0.72, log-rank p<0.0001). Median OS was not reached for arm 1 and was 22.6 mo for arm 2 (HR:0.60, 95% CI: 0.36,1.01). In pts with measurable disease, (n= 85 vs 90 in arm 1 vs 2) ORR was 24.7% vs 4.4% and CBR was 47.1% vs 22.2% in arm 1 vs 2, respectively. Dose reductions (45.7% vs 0%) and interruptions (68.5 vs 13.8%) were more frequent for ALP+FUL. Most common AEs (all grades; ≥30%) in arm 1 and 2 were hyperglycemia (72.8% vs 11.7%), diarrhea (51.1% vs 11.7%), nausea (44.6% vs 13.8%), decreased appetite and rash (30.4% each in both arms). Discontinuations in arm 1 and 2 due to AEs (all grades) were 27.2% vs 2.1% respectively. On-treatment deaths were comparable (5.4% vs. 6.4%). At the pre-planned final PFS analysis (cut-off May 2025; median duration 23.5 mo), the median OS was 29.5 and 23.8 months in arms 1 and 2, respectively (HR:0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-0.99, p=0.021). Conclusion: EPIK-B5 met its primary objective with ALP+FUL showing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS in patients with HR+, HER2− ABC harboring a PIK3CA-m after CDK4/6i. There was a positive trend for a prolonged OS in favor of ALP+FUL over PBO with about 5.7 mo improvement in the median OS. There were no new safety signals. Citation Format: M. De Laurentiis, A. M. Ferreira, J. Gligorov, E. Dobi, L. Costa, M. Vidal, A. S. Knop, T. Bachelot, E. Senkus, M. Colleoni, P. Schmid, A. Santoro, G. Zhbantov, J. Foglietta, M. Miller, P. Serra, A. Heniquez, P. Chaudhary, R. Haidinger, S. Kuemmel. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (EPIK-B5): Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF7-02.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-rf7-02
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract RF7-02: Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (EPIK-B5): Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

Renate Haidinger, Erion Dobi, Georgi Zhbantov, M. Vidal et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract RF7-02: Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (EPIK-B5): Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

Renate Haidinger, Erion Dobi, Georgi Zhbantov, M. Vidal, Jennifer Foglietta, E. Senkus, M. Miller, J. Gligorov, P. Serra, T. Bachelot, S. Kuemmel, M. Colleoni, A. Heniquez, A. S. Knop, L. Costa, A. Santoro, P. Chaudhary, M. De Laurentiis, A. M. Ferreira, P. Schmid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Alpelisib (ALP), an α-specific PI3K inhibitor, plus fulvestrant (FUL) improved disease control with a manageable safety in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) harboring a PIK3CA-m in SOLAR-1 and in BYLieve Cohort A trials. We report primary results from the EPIK-B5 study, comparing ALP+FUL vs placebo (PBO)+FUL in men/postmenopausal women with PIK3CA-m HR+, HER2− ABC who had progressed on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i)+aromatase inhibitor (AI). Methods: EPIK-B5 was a phase 3, double-blind, PBO-controlled study. Pts (n=188) were randomised 1:1 to ALP+FUL (arm 1) or PBO+FUL (arm 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee [BIRC]. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), PFS by PIK3CA-m in baseline ctDNA, adverse events (AEs), time to definitive deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, change in global health status and symptom scale scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and time to progression on next line treatment or death (PFS2) by investigator assessment. Results: Baseline characteristics are shown in the Table. At primary analysis (data cutoff Oct 2024), median follow-up duration was 17.7 (1.4-33.1) months (mo). The median PFS (BIRC) was 7.4 and 2.8 mo in arm 1 and 2, respectively, (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37,0.72, log-rank p<0.0001). Median OS was not reached for arm 1 and was 22.6 mo for arm 2 (HR:0.60, 95% CI: 0.36,1.01). In pts with measurable disease, (n= 85 vs 90 in arm 1 vs 2) ORR was 24.7% vs 4.4% and CBR was 47.1% vs 22.2% in arm 1 vs 2, respectively. Dose reductions (45.7% vs 0%) and interruptions (68.5 vs 13.8%) were more frequent for ALP+FUL. Most common AEs (all grades; ≥30%) in arm 1 and 2 were hyperglycemia (72.8% vs 11.7%), diarrhea (51.1% vs 11.7%), nausea (44.6% vs 13.8%), decreased appetite and rash (30.4% each in both arms). Discontinuations in arm 1 and 2 due to AEs (all grades) were 27.2% vs 2.1% respectively. On-treatment deaths were comparable (5.4% vs. 6.4%). At the pre-planned final PFS analysis (cut-off May 2025; median duration 23.5 mo), the median OS was 29.5 and 23.8 months in arms 1 and 2, respectively (HR:0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-0.99, p=0.021). Conclusion: EPIK-B5 met its primary objective with ALP+FUL showing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS in patients with HR+, HER2− ABC harboring a PIK3CA-m after CDK4/6i. There was a positive trend for a prolonged OS in favor of ALP+FUL over PBO with about 5.7 mo improvement in the median OS. There were no new safety signals. Citation Format: M. De Laurentiis, A. M. Ferreira, J. Gligorov, E. Dobi, L. Costa, M. Vidal, A. S. Knop, T. Bachelot, E. Senkus, M. Colleoni, P. Schmid, A. Santoro, G. Zhbantov, J. Foglietta, M. Miller, P. Serra, A. Heniquez, P. Chaudhary, R. Haidinger, S. Kuemmel. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (EPIK-B5): Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF7-02.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Humanitas University (IT), Queen Mary University of London (GB), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Rigshospitalet (DK), Medical University of Sofia (BG), Sorbonne Université (FR), University of Gdańsk (PL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Novartis (India) (IN), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Ouest (FR), Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria (IT), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE), Hospital de Santa Maria (PT), Fondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca (IT), Tris Pharma (United States) (US), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.