Racial/ethnic disparities in stages of cardiovascular‐kidney‐metabolic syndrome among reproductive‐aged women in the United States: NHANES 2011–2020

Abstract Objective Recently, the American Heart Association defined, staged, and highlighted the multisystem consequences of poor cardiovascular‐kidney‐metabolic (CKM) syndrome health with a clarion call to harmonize guidelines and provide opportunities for actionable preventive interventions before overt CVD. In the United States, the components that comprise CKM (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, etc.) are potent risk factors for poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, with a disproportionate burden among racial/ethnic minorities. However, population‐level data on CKM syndrome in reproductive‐aged women are scarce, but a critical prerequisite in evaluating the impact of CKM stages on overall pregnancy outcomes. Methods We analyzed 2347 non‐pregnant, reproductive‐aged women (≥20–49 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who had data on all CKM risk factors. We incorporated sampling weights into our analysis to account for the complex NHANES survey design. CKM stages were defined as follows: Stage 0: optimal CKM health with no risk factors; Stage 1: excess/dysfunctional adiposity or early metabolic abnormalities; Stage 2: established metabolic risk factors and/or CKD; Stage 3: high predicted 10‐year CVD risk and/or subclinical CVD or high‐risk CKD; Stage 4: established clinical CVD. We reported prevalence estimates and standard errors of CKM syndrome stages in the overall population by race/ethnicity and across the study period (2011–2020). Results The mean age was 34.6 ± 7.7 years, with 57.3% non‐Hispanic (NH) White, 18.8% Hispanic, 13.2% NH Black, 6.4% NH Asian, and 4.3% self‐reported other races. Over the study period, 74.7% of participants had CKM syndrome (Stage 1: 37.3%, Stage 2: 35.7%, Stage 3: 0.3%, and Stage 4: 1.97%) with notable variations. NH Black women had the lowest prevalence of Stage 0 CKM (13.2%) and the highest prevalence of Stages 2 (42.3%) and 3 (1.1%) CKM. Hispanic and other minority women had the highest prevalence of Stages 1 (43.42%) and 4 (5.11%) CKM, respectively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion The high prevalence of CKM syndrome in reproductive‐aged women in the United States, with notable racial/ethnic disparities, underscores a clarion call to intensify health equity efforts aimed at mitigating CKM risk in women of childbearing age. Studies evaluating the implications of these findings for overall pregnancy outcomes are urgently warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70263
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial/ethnic disparities in stages of cardiovascular‐kidney‐metabolic syndrome among reproductive‐aged women in the United States: NHANES 2011–2020

Amponsah Peprah, Amber E Lachaud, L Levine, J Lewey et al.
Pregnancy
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Racial/ethnic disparities in stages of cardiovascular‐kidney‐metabolic syndrome among reproductive‐aged women in the United States: NHANES 2011–2020

Amponsah Peprah, Amber E Lachaud, L Levine, J Lewey, Ebenezer K. Aryee, Eric K. Broni
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Recently, the American Heart Association defined, staged, and highlighted the multisystem consequences of poor cardiovascular‐kidney‐metabolic (CKM) syndrome health with a clarion call to harmonize guidelines and provide opportunities for actionable preventive interventions before overt CVD. In the United States, the components that comprise CKM (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, etc.) are potent risk factors for poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, with a disproportionate burden among racial/ethnic minorities. However, population‐level data on CKM syndrome in reproductive‐aged women are scarce, but a critical prerequisite in evaluating the impact of CKM stages on overall pregnancy outcomes. Methods We analyzed 2347 non‐pregnant, reproductive‐aged women (≥20–49 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who had data on all CKM risk factors. We incorporated sampling weights into our analysis to account for the complex NHANES survey design. CKM stages were defined as follows: Stage 0: optimal CKM health with no risk factors; Stage 1: excess/dysfunctional adiposity or early metabolic abnormalities; Stage 2: established metabolic risk factors and/or CKD; Stage 3: high predicted 10‐year CVD risk and/or subclinical CVD or high‐risk CKD; Stage 4: established clinical CVD. We reported prevalence estimates and standard errors of CKM syndrome stages in the overall population by race/ethnicity and across the study period (2011–2020). Results The mean age was 34.6 ± 7.7 years, with 57.3% non‐Hispanic (NH) White, 18.8% Hispanic, 13.2% NH Black, 6.4% NH Asian, and 4.3% self‐reported other races. Over the study period, 74.7% of participants had CKM syndrome (Stage 1: 37.3%, Stage 2: 35.7%, Stage 3: 0.3%, and Stage 4: 1.97%) with notable variations. NH Black women had the lowest prevalence of Stage 0 CKM (13.2%) and the highest prevalence of Stages 2 (42.3%) and 3 (1.1%) CKM. Hispanic and other minority women had the highest prevalence of Stages 1 (43.42%) and 4 (5.11%) CKM, respectively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion The high prevalence of CKM syndrome in reproductive‐aged women in the United States, with notable racial/ethnic disparities, underscores a clarion call to intensify health equity efforts aimed at mitigating CKM risk in women of childbearing age. Studies evaluating the implications of these findings for overall pregnancy outcomes are urgently warranted.

PregnancyVol. 2(2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Yale University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.