“What Difference Does that Make to a Med?” The Sensory and Social Regimes of the Dissecting Room at the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania

Nineteenth-century American medical education was shaped by constrictive norms of the world beyond hospitals and schools. During their training, female students negotiated that cinching both relationally and within their own bodies. At the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania, teachers and students imposed classed, gendered, and racialized notions onto the bodies of dissectors and corpses. Examining four autobiographical texts by women who attended the school, I argue that dissecting room experiences were foundational and transformative for women’s relationships and indoctrination into doctoring, as students cultivated what I term the “anatomo affect.” Analyzing dissection through the lens of sensation, I suggest that by fleeing before feeling faint, steeling themselves against the “ickiness” of smells and tactile encounters, perhaps participating in body trafficking, and ultimately by surveilling and policing affect, students tried to reconcile sometimes-contradictory imperatives of unflappability and “femininity” while forging identities as doctors and women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isis
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739470
Primary Topic
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“What Difference Does that Make to a Med?” The Sensory and Social Regimes of the Dissecting Room at the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania

Joan Hester
Isis
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
article

“What Difference Does that Make to a Med?” The Sensory and Social Regimes of the Dissecting Room at the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania

Joan Hester
article en

Abstract

Nineteenth-century American medical education was shaped by constrictive norms of the world beyond hospitals and schools. During their training, female students negotiated that cinching both relationally and within their own bodies. At the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania, teachers and students imposed classed, gendered, and racialized notions onto the bodies of dissectors and corpses. Examining four autobiographical texts by women who attended the school, I argue that dissecting room experiences were foundational and transformative for women’s relationships and indoctrination into doctoring, as students cultivated what I term the “anatomo affect.” Analyzing dissection through the lens of sensation, I suggest that by fleeing before feeling faint, steeling themselves against the “ickiness” of smells and tactile encounters, perhaps participating in body trafficking, and ultimately by surveilling and policing affect, students tried to reconcile sometimes-contradictory imperatives of unflappability and “femininity” while forging identities as doctors and women.

IsisVol. 117(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.