Machine learning and theory-ladenness: a phenomenological account

We provide an analysis of theory-ladenness in machine learning (ML) in science, where ‘theory’ (that we call ‘domain-theory’) refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show (against recent trends in philosophy of science) that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain-theory, even if the model remains theory-laden in a weak sense, which we call theory-infection. These claims, we argue, have far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shift the priorities of the debate on theory-ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05454-8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning and theory-ladenness: a phenomenological account

Alberto Termine, Alessandro Facchini, Emanuele Ratti
Synthese
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Machine learning and theory-ladenness: a phenomenological account

Alberto Termine, Alessandro Facchini, Emanuele Ratti
article en

Abstract

We provide an analysis of theory-ladenness in machine learning (ML) in science, where ‘theory’ (that we call ‘domain-theory’) refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show (against recent trends in philosophy of science) that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain-theory, even if the model remains theory-laden in a weak sense, which we call theory-infection. These claims, we argue, have far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shift the priorities of the debate on theory-ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative.

SyntheseVol. 207(3)
Kozminski University (PL), Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research (CH), University of Bristol (GB)
University of Bristol
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine learning and theory-ladenness: a phenomenological account — Alberto Termine, Alessandro Facchini, et al. · Synthese (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS