Discuss, Debate, Delay: How Museums Filibuster the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

ABSTRACT Museums and federal agencies regularly circumvent requirements of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The 2024 NAGPRA regulation updates closed some loopholes, but institutions continue to filibuster the NAGPRA process through both intention and ignorance. Instead of working toward repatriation, academics continue to theorize and write about NAGPRA. Additionally, museums and federal agencies fail to understand the definition and intentions of consultation and repatriation. Consultation initiation should occur intentionally, and all NAGPRA professionals should recognize that repatriation is about possession or control as opposed to custody. By accurately adhering to the NAGPRA process, NAGPRA practitioners may better serve Native peoples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Museum Anthropology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/muan.70034
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discuss, Debate, Delay: How Museums Filibuster the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

Tanner Scot Barney, Audrey Briana Andrews
Museum Anthropology
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Discuss, Debate, Delay: How Museums Filibuster the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

Tanner Scot Barney, Audrey Briana Andrews
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Museums and federal agencies regularly circumvent requirements of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The 2024 NAGPRA regulation updates closed some loopholes, but institutions continue to filibuster the NAGPRA process through both intention and ignorance. Instead of working toward repatriation, academics continue to theorize and write about NAGPRA. Additionally, museums and federal agencies fail to understand the definition and intentions of consultation and repatriation. Consultation initiation should occur intentionally, and all NAGPRA professionals should recognize that repatriation is about possession or control as opposed to custody. By accurately adhering to the NAGPRA process, NAGPRA practitioners may better serve Native peoples.

Museum AnthropologyVol. 49(1)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), Washington State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discuss, Debate, Delay: How Museums Filibuster the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act — Tanner Scot Barney, Audrey Briana Andrews · Museum Anthropology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS