Abstract PS1-11-17: Real-world comparison of time to next treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with either chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan in the second-line

Abstract Background: According to recent findings from the DESTINY-06 trial, HR-positive (HR+)/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts) who received trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) following ≥1 line of endocrine therapy (ET) experienced improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those who received chemotherapy (chemo) in a second-line (2L) setting. To assess whether similar benefits are seen in a real-world setting, we evaluated overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). TTNT was used as a surrogate measure for PFS. Methods: We used the IntegraConnect PrecisionQ de-identified electronic health record database of >3 million cancer pts across >500 care sites, to identify pts. Eligible pts for the study were adults with a confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2-low mBC who had ≥2 documented visits and a CDK4/6 inhibitor(i) +/- ET in the first-line metastatic setting. Pts with a subsequent treatment (2L) with T-Dxd or chemo were identified and observed between 6-1-2022 and 4-30-2025. TTNT was defined as time from the 2L start to either the initiation of a subsequent line of therapy or death. We did not assess for the reason pts discontinued (e.g., toxicity or disease progression). TTNT and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) adjusting for age at treatment and race were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among 340 eligible pts, 82 received TDxd and 248 received chemo in the 2L setting. The median age at treatment was 64 (interquartile range 55, 70) years old with a composition of 70.0% White, 10.6% African American. Among pts with a reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status at treatment, 91.5% had an ECOG score of ≤1. Median OS was not significantly different for pts who received T-Dxd compared to chemo (Table), but median TTNT was significantly longer for pts who received T-Dxd (10.1 months, 95% CI: 7.8, 13.1) compared to chemo (6.0 months, 95% CI: 5.1, 6.5). Pts using T-Dxd were significantly less likely to change treatment compared to chemo after adjusting for age, and race [HR (95% CI): 0.45 (0.30, 0.66), P<0.01)]. Treatment crossover occurred in both cohorts: 28% of pts in the chemo group utilized T-Dxd in a later line of therapy, and 19% of pts in the T-Dxd group utilized chemo in a later line of therapy. Conclusions: Consistent with findings from a subset of the Destiny-06 trial, HR+/HER2-low mBC pts previously treated with a CDK4/6i who then utilized T-Dxd in the 2L setting were associated with a significantly improved TTNT compared to 2L chemo utilization. OS was not statistically different between T-Dxd and Chemo. These results may be impacted by unmeasured factors such as, tumor burden, endocrine resistance, and access to care. Further studies are needed to confirm the optimal sequencing of TDxd in the real-world setting. Citation Format: R. Mahtani, R. Choksi, F. Kudrik, D. Patt, S. Reddy, S. Reganti, S. Rosenfeld, S. W. Champaloux, D. Parris, A. Rui, A. Sharma, M. Gart, C. Wall, B. Wang, P. Varughese, J. Donegan, L. Morere, R. Geller, J. Scott, V. Gorantla. Real-world comparison of time to next treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with either chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan in the second-line [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-11-17.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-11-17
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-11-17: Real-world comparison of time to next treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with either chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan in the second-line

Fred J. Kudrik, Rushir J. Choksi, Debra A. Patt, B. Wang et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS1-11-17: Real-world comparison of time to next treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with either chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan in the second-line

Fred J. Kudrik, Rushir J. Choksi, Debra A. Patt, B. Wang, R. L. Mahtani, P. Varughese, A. Sharma, D. Parris, A. Rui, R. Geller, S. Reganti, S. Reddy, V. Gorantla, M. Gart, J. Donegan, S. Rosenfeld, S. W. Champaloux, L. Morere, C. Wall, J. Scott
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: According to recent findings from the DESTINY-06 trial, HR-positive (HR+)/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts) who received trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) following ≥1 line of endocrine therapy (ET) experienced improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those who received chemotherapy (chemo) in a second-line (2L) setting. To assess whether similar benefits are seen in a real-world setting, we evaluated overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). TTNT was used as a surrogate measure for PFS. Methods: We used the IntegraConnect PrecisionQ de-identified electronic health record database of >3 million cancer pts across >500 care sites, to identify pts. Eligible pts for the study were adults with a confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2-low mBC who had ≥2 documented visits and a CDK4/6 inhibitor(i) +/- ET in the first-line metastatic setting. Pts with a subsequent treatment (2L) with T-Dxd or chemo were identified and observed between 6-1-2022 and 4-30-2025. TTNT was defined as time from the 2L start to either the initiation of a subsequent line of therapy or death. We did not assess for the reason pts discontinued (e.g., toxicity or disease progression). TTNT and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) adjusting for age at treatment and race were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among 340 eligible pts, 82 received TDxd and 248 received chemo in the 2L setting. The median age at treatment was 64 (interquartile range 55, 70) years old with a composition of 70.0% White, 10.6% African American. Among pts with a reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status at treatment, 91.5% had an ECOG score of ≤1. Median OS was not significantly different for pts who received T-Dxd compared to chemo (Table), but median TTNT was significantly longer for pts who received T-Dxd (10.1 months, 95% CI: 7.8, 13.1) compared to chemo (6.0 months, 95% CI: 5.1, 6.5). Pts using T-Dxd were significantly less likely to change treatment compared to chemo after adjusting for age, and race [HR (95% CI): 0.45 (0.30, 0.66), P<0.01)]. Treatment crossover occurred in both cohorts: 28% of pts in the chemo group utilized T-Dxd in a later line of therapy, and 19% of pts in the T-Dxd group utilized chemo in a later line of therapy. Conclusions: Consistent with findings from a subset of the Destiny-06 trial, HR+/HER2-low mBC pts previously treated with a CDK4/6i who then utilized T-Dxd in the 2L setting were associated with a significantly improved TTNT compared to 2L chemo utilization. OS was not statistically different between T-Dxd and Chemo. These results may be impacted by unmeasured factors such as, tumor burden, endocrine resistance, and access to care. Further studies are needed to confirm the optimal sequencing of TDxd in the real-world setting. Citation Format: R. Mahtani, R. Choksi, F. Kudrik, D. Patt, S. Reddy, S. Reganti, S. Rosenfeld, S. W. Champaloux, D. Parris, A. Rui, A. Sharma, M. Gart, C. Wall, B. Wang, P. Varughese, J. Donegan, L. Morere, R. Geller, J. Scott, V. Gorantla. Real-world comparison of time to next treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with either chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan in the second-line [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-11-17.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Texas Oncology (US), Baptist Health South Florida (US), South Carolina Oncology Associates (US), Highlands Oncology Group (US), West Palm Beach VA Medical Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Oncology Specialists (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.