Efficacy and tolerability of hypofractionated and dose-boosted radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024601045), we evaluated the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated and dose-boosted radiotherapy fractionation schedules in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar on 2025-06-15 for randomised controlled trials (RCT) using equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) ≥ 70 Gy in both arms, with outcomes including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and rates of grade ≥ 2/≥3 adverse events (AEs). Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and presented in forest plots. Risk-of-bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We identified 25 RCTs involving 12,479 patients. Combining external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy or with focal boost was associated with significant MFS improvement (n = 1468, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.95, p = 0.016) compared to standard radiotherapy. A sensitivity analysis including two studies with extended follow-up suggested possible OS benefit (n = 897, HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.6-0.95, p = 0.016). BRFS was evaluated in 15 trials testing hypofractionation (n = 10220). We found a small numerical improvement (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76-1, p = 0.058), though not well explained by the EQD2 model, and no significant differences in MFS or OS. Acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal AEs were modestly increased with moderate hypofractionation, and acute grade ≥ 3 genitourinary AEs were increased with ultra-hypofractionation, without significant differences in late AEs. Primary limitations included concerns regarding RoB associated with patient allocation in dose-boost analysis, and impact of open-label study designs on AE reporting. These findings support the use of dose-boosting as a means to improve survival in high-risk patients, and hypofractionation as a method to reduce treatment time associated with a potential improvement in disease control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111445
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and tolerability of hypofractionated and dose-boosted radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shayan Smani, Navid Roessler, Thomas Zilli, Tamás Fazekas et al.
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Efficacy and tolerability of hypofractionated and dose-boosted radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shayan Smani, Navid Roessler, Thomas Zilli, Tamás Fazekas, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Federico Mastroleo, Mario Terlizzi, Shota Inoue, Yi An, Matthias Moll, Oliver Blanck, Giulia Marvaso, Paweł Rajwa, Pierre Blanchard, Michael S. Leapman, Nishan Sohoni, Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Timo FW Soeterik, Marcin Miszczyk, Guillaume Ploussard, Keiichiro Miyajima, Constantinos Zamboglou
article en

Abstract

In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024601045), we evaluated the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated and dose-boosted radiotherapy fractionation schedules in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar on 2025-06-15 for randomised controlled trials (RCT) using equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) ≥ 70 Gy in both arms, with outcomes including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and rates of grade ≥ 2/≥3 adverse events (AEs). Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and presented in forest plots. Risk-of-bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We identified 25 RCTs involving 12,479 patients. Combining external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy or with focal boost was associated with significant MFS improvement (n = 1468, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.95, p = 0.016) compared to standard radiotherapy. A sensitivity analysis including two studies with extended follow-up suggested possible OS benefit (n = 897, HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.6-0.95, p = 0.016). BRFS was evaluated in 15 trials testing hypofractionation (n = 10220). We found a small numerical improvement (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76-1, p = 0.058), though not well explained by the EQD2 model, and no significant differences in MFS or OS. Acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal AEs were modestly increased with moderate hypofractionation, and acute grade ≥ 3 genitourinary AEs were increased with ultra-hypofractionation, without significant differences in late AEs. Primary limitations included concerns regarding RoB associated with patient allocation in dose-boost analysis, and impact of open-label study designs on AE reporting. These findings support the use of dose-boosting as a means to improve survival in high-risk patients, and hypofractionation as a method to reduce treatment time associated with a potential improvement in disease control.

Radiotherapy and OncologyVol. 218
Semmelweis University (HU), Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), Inserm (FR), Universität Hamburg (DE), Okayama University (JP), Cornell University (US), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Yale University (US), Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (AT), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH), St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL), Limassol General Hospital (CY), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), University Cancer Center Hamburg (DE), Lyon Genou Centre Albert Trillat (FR), MedAustron (AT), University College London (GB), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH), European Institute of Oncology (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT), University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.