Early Predictors of Walking Recovery in Patients after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To identify, categorize, and rank the predictors of walking recovery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). We prospectively registered (CRD42023443454) this review and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science until July 2025. We assessed study eligibility, extracted data, appraised study quality using the Quality In Prognostic Studies, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We meta-analyzed adjusted effect estimates within the same stratification when data from two or more studies were available; when meta-analysis was not appropriate, we presented the results qualitatively. Fifty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality levels were rated as poor (3 [5.6%] of 54 studies), fair (40 [70%]), and good (11 [20.4%]) quality. Predictor variables were classified into five categories: (1) sociodemographic factors, (2) injury-related factors, (3) magnetic resonance imaging parameters, (4) serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and (5) treatment-related factors. American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and neurological level of injury (NLI) were found to be the most significant predictors of walking recovery (odds ratio [OR] = 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.86-4.79; <i>p</i> = 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 2%; high certainty) and (OR = 2.81; 95% CI: 1.54-5.14; <i>p</i> = 0.008; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; moderate certainty), respectively. Patients with diabetes were less likely to regain ambulatory ability after SCI (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.038; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; moderate certainty). Other widely studied predictors, such as age and timing of surgery, showed inconsistent results across cutoffs. In conclusion, the initial severity of injury (AIS and NLI) was the strongest predictor of walking recovery, indicating that patients with less severe impairment at admission had a higher probability of walking recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251407646
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Predictors of Walking Recovery in Patients after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhehao Dai, Jinnan Ou, Xiaoju Tan, Chun Sheng et al.
Journal of Neurotrauma
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Early Predictors of Walking Recovery in Patients after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhehao Dai, Jinnan Ou, Xiaoju Tan, Chun Sheng, Lihuan Cao, Zhang Miaoyuan
article en

Abstract

To identify, categorize, and rank the predictors of walking recovery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). We prospectively registered (CRD42023443454) this review and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science until July 2025. We assessed study eligibility, extracted data, appraised study quality using the Quality In Prognostic Studies, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We meta-analyzed adjusted effect estimates within the same stratification when data from two or more studies were available; when meta-analysis was not appropriate, we presented the results qualitatively. Fifty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality levels were rated as poor (3 [5.6%] of 54 studies), fair (40 [70%]), and good (11 [20.4%]) quality. Predictor variables were classified into five categories: (1) sociodemographic factors, (2) injury-related factors, (3) magnetic resonance imaging parameters, (4) serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and (5) treatment-related factors. American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and neurological level of injury (NLI) were found to be the most significant predictors of walking recovery (odds ratio [OR] = 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.86-4.79; <i>p</i> = 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 2%; high certainty) and (OR = 2.81; 95% CI: 1.54-5.14; <i>p</i> = 0.008; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; moderate certainty), respectively. Patients with diabetes were less likely to regain ambulatory ability after SCI (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.038; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; moderate certainty). Other widely studied predictors, such as age and timing of surgery, showed inconsistent results across cutoffs. In conclusion, the initial severity of injury (AIS and NLI) was the strongest predictor of walking recovery, indicating that patients with less severe impairment at admission had a higher probability of walking recovery.

Journal of Neurotrauma
Central South University (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.