Abstract PS2-01-14: Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy among women age 50-70: applying updated ASCO guidelines to a real-world population

Abstract Background: In April 2025 the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published practice-changing guidelines recommending the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early-stage breast cancer over the age of 50. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with a positive SLNB and the impact on adjuvant therapy among patients meeting updated ASCO Guideline recommendations for SLNB omission. Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients 50-70 years old diagnosed with early-stage invasive breast cancer (cT1N0, grade 1-2, ER+, HER2-) between 2022-2024 who underwent SLNB. All patients were cN0 and pre-operative axillary ultrasound (axUS) was not required. The primary outcome was SLNB positivity (SLNB+), defined as at least pN1mi, and secondary outcome was adjuvant treatment. Categorical covariates were compared in univariate analysis using Fischer’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with SLNB+, adjusting for relevant clinical characteristics. Results: Among 282 patients meeting ASCO guideline criteria, 275 (97.5%) had SLNB results available for analysis. Among the cohort with SLNB, median age was 63 years (IQR 58-66) and the majority (81.0%) were ductal histology (Table 1). Adjuvant therapy included hormonal therapy (87.0%), whole breast radiation (73.0%), partial breast radiation (19.0%) and chemotherapy (5.8%). SLNB was positive in 17 (6.2%) patients (9 pN1mi, 8 pN1a, 0 pN2). Among those with pN1a, two patients had 2 positive nodes (one was pT2 and one had Oncotype Recurrence Score [RS] of 29) and no patients had 3 nodes. Factors associated with SLNB+ included tumor grade, pathologic tumor stage and Oncotype RS. In multivariable analysis, younger age and Oncotype RS were associated with SLNB+ but not tumor grade or tumor stage (Table 1). Among the 17 patients with SLNB+, 5 (29.4%) received chemotherapy of which 4 had a high Oncotype RS and 1 was pT2 on final pathology. Per 2024 Updated ASTRO Guideline, APBI would have been suitable for 8, and cautionary or not recommended for 6 patients with SLNB+ based on risk factors alone (3 pT2, 2 lobular histology, 1 with lymphovascular invasion [LVI]), and potentially 3 other patients with Oncotype RS >25. Among 8 patients with pN1a, 2 had a high-risk feature (both Ki67>20%) indicating eligibility for adjuvant CDK4/6i per 2024 ASCO Guideline. Conclusion: In this cohort of 50- to 70-year-old patients with cT1N0 tumors meeting ASCO Guidelines for SLNB omission in the real-world setting of inconsistent pre-operative axUS, 6.2% were SLNB+. No decisions about chemotherapy would have been affected by the omission of SLNB. The positive SLNB could have impacted a total of 10 (3.6%) patients who may have received APBI instead of WBRT or not been eligible for CDK4/6i. Citation Format: E. C. Namoglu, A. Meisner, M. R. Flanagan, E. F. Gillespie. Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy among women age 50-70: applying updated ASCO guidelines to a real-world population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-01-14.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-01-14
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS2-01-14: Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy among women age 50-70: applying updated ASCO guidelines to a real-world population

Allison Meisner, E. C. Namoglu, M. R. Flanagan, E. F. Gillespie
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS2-01-14: Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy among women age 50-70: applying updated ASCO guidelines to a real-world population

Allison Meisner, E. C. Namoglu, M. R. Flanagan, E. F. Gillespie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: In April 2025 the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published practice-changing guidelines recommending the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early-stage breast cancer over the age of 50. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with a positive SLNB and the impact on adjuvant therapy among patients meeting updated ASCO Guideline recommendations for SLNB omission. Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients 50-70 years old diagnosed with early-stage invasive breast cancer (cT1N0, grade 1-2, ER+, HER2-) between 2022-2024 who underwent SLNB. All patients were cN0 and pre-operative axillary ultrasound (axUS) was not required. The primary outcome was SLNB positivity (SLNB+), defined as at least pN1mi, and secondary outcome was adjuvant treatment. Categorical covariates were compared in univariate analysis using Fischer’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with SLNB+, adjusting for relevant clinical characteristics. Results: Among 282 patients meeting ASCO guideline criteria, 275 (97.5%) had SLNB results available for analysis. Among the cohort with SLNB, median age was 63 years (IQR 58-66) and the majority (81.0%) were ductal histology (Table 1). Adjuvant therapy included hormonal therapy (87.0%), whole breast radiation (73.0%), partial breast radiation (19.0%) and chemotherapy (5.8%). SLNB was positive in 17 (6.2%) patients (9 pN1mi, 8 pN1a, 0 pN2). Among those with pN1a, two patients had 2 positive nodes (one was pT2 and one had Oncotype Recurrence Score [RS] of 29) and no patients had 3 nodes. Factors associated with SLNB+ included tumor grade, pathologic tumor stage and Oncotype RS. In multivariable analysis, younger age and Oncotype RS were associated with SLNB+ but not tumor grade or tumor stage (Table 1). Among the 17 patients with SLNB+, 5 (29.4%) received chemotherapy of which 4 had a high Oncotype RS and 1 was pT2 on final pathology. Per 2024 Updated ASTRO Guideline, APBI would have been suitable for 8, and cautionary or not recommended for 6 patients with SLNB+ based on risk factors alone (3 pT2, 2 lobular histology, 1 with lymphovascular invasion [LVI]), and potentially 3 other patients with Oncotype RS >25. Among 8 patients with pN1a, 2 had a high-risk feature (both Ki67>20%) indicating eligibility for adjuvant CDK4/6i per 2024 ASCO Guideline. Conclusion: In this cohort of 50- to 70-year-old patients with cT1N0 tumors meeting ASCO Guidelines for SLNB omission in the real-world setting of inconsistent pre-operative axUS, 6.2% were SLNB+. No decisions about chemotherapy would have been affected by the omission of SLNB. The positive SLNB could have impacted a total of 10 (3.6%) patients who may have received APBI instead of WBRT or not been eligible for CDK4/6i. Citation Format: E. C. Namoglu, A. Meisner, M. R. Flanagan, E. F. Gillespie. Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy among women age 50-70: applying updated ASCO guidelines to a real-world population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-01-14.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), University of Washington (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.