Do AI Chatbots Improve Students’ Learning Performance in Programming Education? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

AI chatbots have emerged as innovative educational tools and drawn increasing attention from educators and researchers in programming education. Although previous research has highlighted potentials of applying AI chatbots in programming education, there is a lack of empirical evidence to understand the overall effects of using AI chatbots in programming learning as well as the critical factors that influence the effects. To fill this gap, this study conducted a meta-analysis of 32 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 to examine the overall effect size of applying AI chatbots on programming learning performance and identify significant moderators. The results indicated a small-to-medium effect on posttest performance ( g+ = 0.538, 95% CI [.202, .873], p < .01) and a medium-to-large effect on practice performance ( g+ = 0.650, 95% CI [.330, .970], p < .001), based on robust variance estimation models. Moderator analyses revealed that research design and AI chatbot-to-student ratio significantly influenced posttest performance. Specifically, true experimental designs demonstrated significantly larger effects than quasi-experimental designs, and a 1:1 chatbot-student ratio was substantially more effective than a 1:N ratio. These findings underscore the potential of AI chatbots in programming education and offer practical insights for optimizing their integration into instructional design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331261424211
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do AI Chatbots Improve Students’ Learning Performance in Programming Education? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Yan Dong, Hui Chen, Hongji Deng
Journal of Educational Computing Research
AI in Service Interactions
article

Do AI Chatbots Improve Students’ Learning Performance in Programming Education? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Yan Dong, Hui Chen, Hongji Deng
article en

Abstract

AI chatbots have emerged as innovative educational tools and drawn increasing attention from educators and researchers in programming education. Although previous research has highlighted potentials of applying AI chatbots in programming education, there is a lack of empirical evidence to understand the overall effects of using AI chatbots in programming learning as well as the critical factors that influence the effects. To fill this gap, this study conducted a meta-analysis of 32 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 to examine the overall effect size of applying AI chatbots on programming learning performance and identify significant moderators. The results indicated a small-to-medium effect on posttest performance ( g+ = 0.538, 95% CI [.202, .873], p < .01) and a medium-to-large effect on practice performance ( g+ = 0.650, 95% CI [.330, .970], p < .001), based on robust variance estimation models. Moderator analyses revealed that research design and AI chatbot-to-student ratio significantly influenced posttest performance. Specifically, true experimental designs demonstrated significantly larger effects than quasi-experimental designs, and a 1:1 chatbot-student ratio was substantially more effective than a 1:N ratio. These findings underscore the potential of AI chatbots in programming education and offer practical insights for optimizing their integration into instructional design.

Journal of Educational Computing Research
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.