A meta-analysis identifies driver genes and characterizes the molecular epidemiology of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is thought to develop through the stepwise accumulation of somatic mutations. Recent years have seen the publications of several studies greatly advancing our understanding of the molecular events driving the disease. However, individual studies tend to be small and additional insights may be obtained through the combination of data from multiple sources. We performed targeted sequencing of 2172 colorectal cancers from Icelandic patients and combined these data with publicly available mutation calls from 9 515 additional tumours collected from the literature. Analysing microsatellite stable (MSS) and instable (MSI) tumours separately, we find evidence of positive selection of mutations in 112 genes that replicate across multiple studies of patients with diverse demographics. We carried out a meta-analysis of conditional selection, identifying 57 gene pairs where a mutation in one gene influences the selection of the other. We describe many associations with tumour phenotypes, including a strong association between mucinous histology and mutations in the transcription growth factor beta (TGFb) pathway, only in MSS tumours. Our study demonstrates how combining evidence from multiple sources allows for new discoveries in cancer genomics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39255-3
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A meta-analysis identifies driver genes and characterizes the molecular epidemiology of colorectal cancer

Sigurgeir Ólafsson, Louise le Roux, Hákon Jónsson, Emilia Söebech et al.
Scientific Reports
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

A meta-analysis identifies driver genes and characterizes the molecular epidemiology of colorectal cancer

Sigurgeir Ólafsson, Louise le Roux, Hákon Jónsson, Emilia Söebech, Sigurjón A. Guðjónsson, Hildur Knútsdóttir, Magnus I. Magnusson, Thordur Tryggvason, Hjaltey Runarsdottir, Erna M. Jonsdottir, Bjarney S. Kristinsdottir, Helga Sigrun Gunnarsdottir, Thorunn Rafnar, Jona Saemundsdottir, Olafur Th. Magnusson, D F Gudbjartsson, Jon G. Jonasson, Magnus O. Ulfarsson, Thorri Thorarinsson, Mariana Bustamante, Droplaug N. Magnusdottir, Bjarni A. Agnarson
article en

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is thought to develop through the stepwise accumulation of somatic mutations. Recent years have seen the publications of several studies greatly advancing our understanding of the molecular events driving the disease. However, individual studies tend to be small and additional insights may be obtained through the combination of data from multiple sources. We performed targeted sequencing of 2172 colorectal cancers from Icelandic patients and combined these data with publicly available mutation calls from 9 515 additional tumours collected from the literature. Analysing microsatellite stable (MSS) and instable (MSI) tumours separately, we find evidence of positive selection of mutations in 112 genes that replicate across multiple studies of patients with diverse demographics. We carried out a meta-analysis of conditional selection, identifying 57 gene pairs where a mutation in one gene influences the selection of the other. We describe many associations with tumour phenotypes, including a strong association between mucinous histology and mutations in the transcription growth factor beta (TGFb) pathway, only in MSS tumours. Our study demonstrates how combining evidence from multiple sources allows for new discoveries in cancer genomics.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Reykjavík University (IS), deCODE Genetics (Iceland) (IS), University of Iceland (IS), National University Hospital of Iceland (IS)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.