Carbon sequestration service flow assessment and threshold-based key factors controlling supply–demand balance in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain

Carbon sequestration services are crucial for climate regulation, yet current assessments predominantly focus on static carbon storage while overlooking dynamic spatial flows and management thresholds in rapidly urbanizing regions. This study developed an integrated framework combining multi-scale spatial analysis with XGBoost-SHAP modeling to evaluate CSS flows and identify thresholds across the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain from 2002 to 2022. The findings reveal: (1) A widening supply-demand gap, with the supply-demand ratio declining from 1.18:1 to 0.40:1 as carbon supply decreased from 8.33 × 108 t to 8.25 × 108 t while demand surged to 20.48 × 108 t; (2) Intensifying spatial heterogeneity from provincial to grid scales, with carbon deficits concentrated in northeastern industrialized areas; (3) A fundamental shift from natural to anthropogenic control, with land use intensity becoming the dominant predictive factor by 2012 (SHAP = 0.137, intensifying to 0.180 by 2022), revealing critical thresholds of population density (109.17 persons/km2), land use intensity (2.44), elevation (187.72 m), and temperature (17.72 °C); (4) Eight priority management zones covering 24,297.77 km2 (2.64% of study area), concentrated in topographically complex regions and vital for regional carbon balance. The irreversibility of threshold transitions renders immediate protection of these areas an urgent policy imperative for achieving carbon neutrality goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114705
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon sequestration service flow assessment and threshold-based key factors controlling supply–demand balance in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain

Qingyuan Yang, Yiwen Sun
Ecological Indicators
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Carbon sequestration service flow assessment and threshold-based key factors controlling supply–demand balance in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain

Qingyuan Yang, Yiwen Sun
article en

Abstract

Carbon sequestration services are crucial for climate regulation, yet current assessments predominantly focus on static carbon storage while overlooking dynamic spatial flows and management thresholds in rapidly urbanizing regions. This study developed an integrated framework combining multi-scale spatial analysis with XGBoost-SHAP modeling to evaluate CSS flows and identify thresholds across the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain from 2002 to 2022. The findings reveal: (1) A widening supply-demand gap, with the supply-demand ratio declining from 1.18:1 to 0.40:1 as carbon supply decreased from 8.33 × 108 t to 8.25 × 108 t while demand surged to 20.48 × 108 t; (2) Intensifying spatial heterogeneity from provincial to grid scales, with carbon deficits concentrated in northeastern industrialized areas; (3) A fundamental shift from natural to anthropogenic control, with land use intensity becoming the dominant predictive factor by 2012 (SHAP = 0.137, intensifying to 0.180 by 2022), revealing critical thresholds of population density (109.17 persons/km2), land use intensity (2.44), elevation (187.72 m), and temperature (17.72 °C); (4) Eight priority management zones covering 24,297.77 km2 (2.64% of study area), concentrated in topographically complex regions and vital for regional carbon balance. The irreversibility of threshold transitions renders immediate protection of these areas an urgent policy imperative for achieving carbon neutrality goals.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 183
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.