Abstract PS1-03-13: Comparative Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Alpelisib With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Real-World Analysis from the TriNetX Network

Abstract Background: Alpelisib, a PI3Kα-specific inhibitor, is approved for use in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with PIK3CA mutations. However, its known metabolic side effects, particularly hyperglycemia, raise concerns for patients with pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with Alpelisib, stratified by diabetes status. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Two cohorts were identified: (1) patients with breast cancer and T2DM treated with Alpelisib (n=655), and (2) patients without diabetes treated with Alpelisib (n=1,102). Treatment pathways were analyzed separately for each cohort. A comparative outcomes analysis was performed using 1:1 propensity score matching (503 patients per cohort) to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate time-to-event outcomes. Patients with prior outcomes were excluded from each respective analysis. Results: After matching, each cohort included 503 patients. Mean follow-up was 562.2 days (SD 484.1) for the T2DM group and 525.1 days (SD 459.7) for the non-diabetic group. Among those without prior death records, 268 of 502 (53.4%) T2DM patients and 274 of 502 (54.6%) non-diabetic patients died during follow-up (median survival: 651 vs. 575 days; HR 0.948, 95% CI: 0.801-1.122, p=0.747). For hospitalization, 67 of 201 (33.3%) T2DM patients and 83 of 233 (35.6%) non-diabetics were hospitalized (median time: 1,178 vs. 1,009 days; HR 0.808, 95% CI: 0.584-1.116, p=0.631). Cancer progression occurred in 24 of 79 (30.4%) T2DM patients and 27 of 75 (36.0%) non-diabetics (median time: 799 vs. 765 days; HR 0.769, 95% CI: 0.443-1.337, p=0.381). Regarding adverse events, T2DM patients had a higher risk of hyperglycemia (95 of 294 [32.3%] vs. 116 of 463 [25.1%]; HR 1.336, 95% CI: 1.018-1.752, p=0.036). For hypokalemia, rates were similar (88 of 360 [24.4%] T2DM vs. 93 of 406 [22.9%] non-diabetics; HR 0.985, 95% CI: 0.735-1.318, p=0.444). Dermatitis was seen in 35 of 453 (7.7%) T2DM patients vs. 42 of 455 (9.2%) non-diabetics (HR 0.791, 95% CI: 0.505-1.239, p=0.249). Heart failure occurred in 37 of 441 (8.4%) T2DM vs. 34 of 474 (7.2%) non-diabetics (HR 1.120, 95% CI: 0.703-1.785, p = 0.282). Myocardial infarction rates were 19 of 494 (3.8%) T2DM and 17 of 484 (3.5%) non-diabetics (HR 1.055, 95% CI: 0.548-2.031, p=0.593). Diarrhea occurred in 62 of 324 (19.1%) T2DM and 87 of 386 (22.5%) non-diabetics (HR 0.831, 95% CI: 0.600-1.152, p=0.283). Pneumonitis developed in 20 of 468 (4.3%) T2DM vs. 15 of 467 (3.2%) non-diabetics (HR 1.284, 95% CI: 0.657-2.509, p=0.806). Treatment pathway analysis revealed that breast cancer patients with T2DM were seven times more likely to discontinue or not proceed to subsequent therapy after Alpelisib compared to non-diabetics, despite similar follow-up durations. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort, breast cancer patients with T2DM treated with Alpelisib experienced comparable survival and cancer progression outcomes to those without diabetes. However, they were at significantly higher risk for hyperglycemia and had less complete treatment documentation, potentially reflecting clinical complexity or data capture limitations. These findings underscore the importance of proactive metabolic monitoring and individualized care strategies for patients with comorbid diabetes receiving Alpelisib. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment sequencing and mitigate toxicity in this high-risk population. Citation Format: F. Khan, M. Zafar, B. Singeltary. Comparative Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Alpelisib With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Real-World Analysis from the TriNetX Network [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-03-13.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-03-13
Primary Topic
PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-03-13: Comparative Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Alpelisib With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Real-World Analysis from the TriNetX Network

Fayaz Khan, Brian Singeltary, Maha Zafar
Clinical Cancer Research
PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
article

Abstract PS1-03-13: Comparative Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Alpelisib With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Real-World Analysis from the TriNetX Network

Fayaz Khan, Brian Singeltary, Maha Zafar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Alpelisib, a PI3Kα-specific inhibitor, is approved for use in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with PIK3CA mutations. However, its known metabolic side effects, particularly hyperglycemia, raise concerns for patients with pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with Alpelisib, stratified by diabetes status. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Two cohorts were identified: (1) patients with breast cancer and T2DM treated with Alpelisib (n=655), and (2) patients without diabetes treated with Alpelisib (n=1,102). Treatment pathways were analyzed separately for each cohort. A comparative outcomes analysis was performed using 1:1 propensity score matching (503 patients per cohort) to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate time-to-event outcomes. Patients with prior outcomes were excluded from each respective analysis. Results: After matching, each cohort included 503 patients. Mean follow-up was 562.2 days (SD 484.1) for the T2DM group and 525.1 days (SD 459.7) for the non-diabetic group. Among those without prior death records, 268 of 502 (53.4%) T2DM patients and 274 of 502 (54.6%) non-diabetic patients died during follow-up (median survival: 651 vs. 575 days; HR 0.948, 95% CI: 0.801-1.122, p=0.747). For hospitalization, 67 of 201 (33.3%) T2DM patients and 83 of 233 (35.6%) non-diabetics were hospitalized (median time: 1,178 vs. 1,009 days; HR 0.808, 95% CI: 0.584-1.116, p=0.631). Cancer progression occurred in 24 of 79 (30.4%) T2DM patients and 27 of 75 (36.0%) non-diabetics (median time: 799 vs. 765 days; HR 0.769, 95% CI: 0.443-1.337, p=0.381). Regarding adverse events, T2DM patients had a higher risk of hyperglycemia (95 of 294 [32.3%] vs. 116 of 463 [25.1%]; HR 1.336, 95% CI: 1.018-1.752, p=0.036). For hypokalemia, rates were similar (88 of 360 [24.4%] T2DM vs. 93 of 406 [22.9%] non-diabetics; HR 0.985, 95% CI: 0.735-1.318, p=0.444). Dermatitis was seen in 35 of 453 (7.7%) T2DM patients vs. 42 of 455 (9.2%) non-diabetics (HR 0.791, 95% CI: 0.505-1.239, p=0.249). Heart failure occurred in 37 of 441 (8.4%) T2DM vs. 34 of 474 (7.2%) non-diabetics (HR 1.120, 95% CI: 0.703-1.785, p = 0.282). Myocardial infarction rates were 19 of 494 (3.8%) T2DM and 17 of 484 (3.5%) non-diabetics (HR 1.055, 95% CI: 0.548-2.031, p=0.593). Diarrhea occurred in 62 of 324 (19.1%) T2DM and 87 of 386 (22.5%) non-diabetics (HR 0.831, 95% CI: 0.600-1.152, p=0.283). Pneumonitis developed in 20 of 468 (4.3%) T2DM vs. 15 of 467 (3.2%) non-diabetics (HR 1.284, 95% CI: 0.657-2.509, p=0.806). Treatment pathway analysis revealed that breast cancer patients with T2DM were seven times more likely to discontinue or not proceed to subsequent therapy after Alpelisib compared to non-diabetics, despite similar follow-up durations. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort, breast cancer patients with T2DM treated with Alpelisib experienced comparable survival and cancer progression outcomes to those without diabetes. However, they were at significantly higher risk for hyperglycemia and had less complete treatment documentation, potentially reflecting clinical complexity or data capture limitations. These findings underscore the importance of proactive metabolic monitoring and individualized care strategies for patients with comorbid diabetes receiving Alpelisib. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment sequencing and mitigate toxicity in this high-risk population. Citation Format: F. Khan, M. Zafar, B. Singeltary. Comparative Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Alpelisib With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Real-World Analysis from the TriNetX Network [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-03-13.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Good Samaritan Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.