Validation of the <scp>miniPIERS</scp> model and a prognostic model for perinatal death in hypertensive pregnancy: Insights from the <scp>PREECARDIA</scp> study in Guinea‐Bissau

The miniPIERS model showed limited utility for risk prediction in this setting, where healthcare infrastructure and population characteristics differ from the model's development context. While the prognostic model for perinatal death showed better discrimination, its poor calibration and high baseline neonatal mortality in this setting suggest that the model's utility must be interpreted cautiously. Future research should focus on larger multicenter validation studies in similar low-resource settings to optimize and adapt risk prediction tools for maternal conditions such as preeclampsia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70850
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the miniPIERS model and a prognostic model for perinatal death in hypertensive pregnancy: Insights from the PREECARDIA study in Guinea‐Bissau

Ruben Turé, Nuno Lunet, Albertino Damasceno
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Validation of the miniPIERS model and a prognostic model for perinatal death in hypertensive pregnancy: Insights from the PREECARDIA study in Guinea‐Bissau

Ruben Turé, Nuno Lunet, Albertino Damasceno
article en

Abstract

The miniPIERS model showed limited utility for risk prediction in this setting, where healthcare infrastructure and population characteristics differ from the model's development context. While the prognostic model for perinatal death showed better discrimination, its poor calibration and high baseline neonatal mortality in this setting suggest that the model's utility must be interpreted cautiously. Future research should focus on larger multicenter validation studies in similar low-resource settings to optimize and adapt risk prediction tools for maternal conditions such as preeclampsia.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), Universidade do Porto (PT), Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisa (GW)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of the <scp>miniPIERS</scp> model and a prognostic model for perinatal death in hypertensive pregnancy: Insights from the <scp>PREECARDIA</scp> study in Guinea‐Bissau — Ruben Turé, Nuno Lunet, et al. · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS