Reevaluating Fracture Forming Limits in Bulk Forming Under Non-Monotonic Strain Loading Paths

This paper examines the applicability of the fracture forming limits (FFLs) derived from conventional monotonic upset compression tests for assessing the formability of non-monotonic strain loading paths. The work uses a simple test specimen subjected to various non-monotonic deformation histories, and combines experimental force measurements, digital image correlation, finite element analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to characterize strain loading paths and crack opening mechanisms under varying testing parameters. Results demonstrate that non-monotonic strain loading paths can result in fracture strains that differ from those obtained through conventional monotonic bulk formability tests in the effective strain versus stress triaxiality space, depending on the considerations made in the transition between different loading stages. Consequently, reliance on monotonic test data may lead to inaccurate predictions of cracking in multi-stage industrial bulk forming processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10020066
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reevaluating Fracture Forming Limits in Bulk Forming Under Non-Monotonic Strain Loading Paths

P.A.F. Martins, Ivo M. F. Bragança, Rui F. V. Sampaio, Carlos M. A. Silva et al.
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
article

Reevaluating Fracture Forming Limits in Bulk Forming Under Non-Monotonic Strain Loading Paths

P.A.F. Martins, Ivo M. F. Bragança, Rui F. V. Sampaio, Carlos M. A. Silva, Guilherme P. Joaquim, João P. M. Pragana
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the applicability of the fracture forming limits (FFLs) derived from conventional monotonic upset compression tests for assessing the formability of non-monotonic strain loading paths. The work uses a simple test specimen subjected to various non-monotonic deformation histories, and combines experimental force measurements, digital image correlation, finite element analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to characterize strain loading paths and crack opening mechanisms under varying testing parameters. Results demonstrate that non-monotonic strain loading paths can result in fracture strains that differ from those obtained through conventional monotonic bulk formability tests in the effective strain versus stress triaxiality space, depending on the considerations made in the transition between different loading stages. Consequently, reliance on monotonic test data may lead to inaccurate predictions of cracking in multi-stage industrial bulk forming processes.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(2)
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.