Abstract PS1-07-02: Precise study: postmastectomy radiotherapy evaluated in breast cancer patients achieving complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background: Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is well-established for high-risk breast cancer treatment. However, with the increasing adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the necessity of PMRT in patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) remains controversial. Recent studies, including the prospective NSABP B-51 trial, suggest minimal or no survival benefit in this population, questioning the routine use of PMRT and opening the door to potential treatment de-escalation. Objective: To evaluate whether PMRT provides an overall survival (OS) benefit in early-stage breast cancer patients who achieve nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC. Secondary objectives included assessing the impact of PMRT on locoregional control and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202460366). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2005 and June 2024. Eligible studies included retrospective and prospective cohorts of women with breast cancer who received NAC, achieved nodal pCR, and underwent mastectomy with or without PMRT. The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included LRR and DFS. Pooled risk ratios and hazard ratios were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochran’s Q test. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger’s test. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: Twenty studies published between 2007 and 2024 were included, comprising 36,380 patients across North America (45%), Asia (45%), and Europe (10%). Of these, 23,228 (63.8%) received PMRT, and 13,152 (36.2%) did not. Median follow-up ranged from 40 to 91 months. Study populations were heterogeneous, including patients with stages T1-T4, mean ages of 46-55 years, and multiple molecular subtypes. PMRT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in LRR (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; p = 0.005), indicating a 2% relative risk reduction. For DFS, HR was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02-1.09; p = 0.004), favoring PMRT with a 5% improvement. No significant OS benefit was observed (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05; p = 0.24). Heterogeneity was moderate for OS (I2 = 50%) and DFS (I2 = 54%), and low-to-moderate for LRR (I2 = 32%). Egger’s test indicated possible publication bias for LRR (p = 0.0017) and DFS (p = 0.010), but not for OS (p = 0.188). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found no significant overall survival benefit from PMRT in patients with nodal pCR after NAC. Although PMRT was associated with statistically significant improvements in disease-free survival and locoregional control, the magnitude of these effects was small and likely clinically insignificant. These findings support the hypothesis that many patients may not require PMRT and could safely benefit from treatment de-escalation strategies. A cautious, individualized approach is recommended, and further prospective studies are needed to identify which subgroups may still derive meaningful benefit from PMRT in the era of effective systemic therapy. Citation Format: M. Antonini, F. P. Cavalcante, A. Mattar, F. P. Zerwes, E. C. Millen, F. P. Brenelli, A. L. Frasson, M. D. Teixeira, M. Madeira, H. L. Couto, G. Facina, R. Arakelian, L. R. Soares, A. D. Lima, R. Freitas Júnior, G. N. Garcia, F. Bagnoli, A. G. Amorim, M. F. de Figueiredo, G. T. Tosello, L. H. Gebrim, G. N. Marta. Precise study: postmastectomy radiotherapy evaluated in breast cancer patients achieving complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-07-02.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-07-02
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-07-02: Precise study: postmastectomy radiotherapy evaluated in breast cancer patients achieving complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Renata Arakelian, Marcelo Antonini, Marcelo Madeira, André Mattar et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS1-07-02: Precise study: postmastectomy radiotherapy evaluated in breast cancer patients achieving complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Renata Arakelian, Marcelo Antonini, Marcelo Madeira, André Mattar, A. G. Amorim, A. Dominique Nascimento Lima, G. N. Marta, E. C. Millen, A. L. Frasson, M. F. de Figueiredo, L. R. Soares, G. N. Garcia, M. D. Teixeira, F. Pimentel Cavalcante, L. H. Gebrim, F. Palermo Brenelli, H. L. Couto, F. Bagnoli, F. Pereira Zerwes, G. T. Tosello, G. Facina, R. Freitas Júnior
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is well-established for high-risk breast cancer treatment. However, with the increasing adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the necessity of PMRT in patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) remains controversial. Recent studies, including the prospective NSABP B-51 trial, suggest minimal or no survival benefit in this population, questioning the routine use of PMRT and opening the door to potential treatment de-escalation. Objective: To evaluate whether PMRT provides an overall survival (OS) benefit in early-stage breast cancer patients who achieve nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC. Secondary objectives included assessing the impact of PMRT on locoregional control and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202460366). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2005 and June 2024. Eligible studies included retrospective and prospective cohorts of women with breast cancer who received NAC, achieved nodal pCR, and underwent mastectomy with or without PMRT. The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included LRR and DFS. Pooled risk ratios and hazard ratios were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochran’s Q test. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger’s test. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: Twenty studies published between 2007 and 2024 were included, comprising 36,380 patients across North America (45%), Asia (45%), and Europe (10%). Of these, 23,228 (63.8%) received PMRT, and 13,152 (36.2%) did not. Median follow-up ranged from 40 to 91 months. Study populations were heterogeneous, including patients with stages T1-T4, mean ages of 46-55 years, and multiple molecular subtypes. PMRT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in LRR (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; p = 0.005), indicating a 2% relative risk reduction. For DFS, HR was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02-1.09; p = 0.004), favoring PMRT with a 5% improvement. No significant OS benefit was observed (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05; p = 0.24). Heterogeneity was moderate for OS (I2 = 50%) and DFS (I2 = 54%), and low-to-moderate for LRR (I2 = 32%). Egger’s test indicated possible publication bias for LRR (p = 0.0017) and DFS (p = 0.010), but not for OS (p = 0.188). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found no significant overall survival benefit from PMRT in patients with nodal pCR after NAC. Although PMRT was associated with statistically significant improvements in disease-free survival and locoregional control, the magnitude of these effects was small and likely clinically insignificant. These findings support the hypothesis that many patients may not require PMRT and could safely benefit from treatment de-escalation strategies. A cautious, individualized approach is recommended, and further prospective studies are needed to identify which subgroups may still derive meaningful benefit from PMRT in the era of effective systemic therapy. Citation Format: M. Antonini, F. P. Cavalcante, A. Mattar, F. P. Zerwes, E. C. Millen, F. P. Brenelli, A. L. Frasson, M. D. Teixeira, M. Madeira, H. L. Couto, G. Facina, R. Arakelian, L. R. Soares, A. D. Lima, R. Freitas Júnior, G. N. Garcia, F. Bagnoli, A. G. Amorim, M. F. de Figueiredo, G. T. Tosello, L. H. Gebrim, G. N. Marta. Precise study: postmastectomy radiotherapy evaluated in breast cancer patients achieving complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-07-02.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR), Universidade do Oeste Paulista (BR), Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (BR), Tokushima Red Cross Hospital (JP), Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (BR), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR), Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica (BR), Hospital São Paulo (BR), Hospital Geral de Fortaleza (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.