A Meta‐Analysis of Employee Unethical Pro‐Organisational Behaviour Based on Identity and Cognitive Perspectives

To explore the effects of organisational orientation in predicting employee unethical pro-organisational behaviour (UPB), this meta-analysis classified organisational orientation into organisational attraction orientation (OAO) and organisational stress orientation (OSO). The meta-analysis results of 410 studies with a total sample size of 140,808 indicate that OAO and OSO, respectively, have a significant positive effect on employee UPB. Structural equation modelling revealed that organisational identification significantly mediated the relationship between OAO and employee UPB, while moral disengagement significantly mediated the relationship between OSO and employee UPB. Organisational identification has stronger explanatory power for the relationship between OAO and UPB than moral disengagement, while moral disengagement has stronger explanatory power for the relationship between OSO and UPB than organisational identification. The moderating effects of indulgence culture and research design between OSO and UPB are significant. This paper contributes to the understanding of the complex mechanisms and boundary conditions of OAO and OSO on employee UPB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70188
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta‐Analysis of Employee Unethical Pro‐Organisational Behaviour Based on Identity and Cognitive Perspectives

Z. Ling, Shengmin Liu, Pengfan Cheng, Leibing Chen et al.
International Journal of Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

A Meta‐Analysis of Employee Unethical Pro‐Organisational Behaviour Based on Identity and Cognitive Perspectives

Z. Ling, Shengmin Liu, Pengfan Cheng, Leibing Chen, Peijia Du
article en

Abstract

To explore the effects of organisational orientation in predicting employee unethical pro-organisational behaviour (UPB), this meta-analysis classified organisational orientation into organisational attraction orientation (OAO) and organisational stress orientation (OSO). The meta-analysis results of 410 studies with a total sample size of 140,808 indicate that OAO and OSO, respectively, have a significant positive effect on employee UPB. Structural equation modelling revealed that organisational identification significantly mediated the relationship between OAO and employee UPB, while moral disengagement significantly mediated the relationship between OSO and employee UPB. Organisational identification has stronger explanatory power for the relationship between OAO and UPB than moral disengagement, while moral disengagement has stronger explanatory power for the relationship between OSO and UPB than organisational identification. The moderating effects of indulgence culture and research design between OSO and UPB are significant. This paper contributes to the understanding of the complex mechanisms and boundary conditions of OAO and OSO on employee UPB.

International Journal of PsychologyVol. 61(2)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai University of International Business and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Meta‐Analysis of Employee Unethical Pro‐Organisational Behaviour Based on Identity and Cognitive Perspectives — Z. Ling, Shengmin Liu, et al. · International Journal of Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS