Abstract PS4-11-03: Prognostic impact of PET and/or breast MRI radiological response in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract Purpose: Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the most relevant prognostic factor for patients with early breast cancer (eBC). However, the prognostic value of complete radiological response assessed by PET and/or breast MRI (bMRI) following NACT remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the potential prognostic significance of radiological complete response (rCR) in patients with eBC undergoing NACT. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with eBC receiving NACT at the University Hospital of Parma between 2018 and 2022. Data about radiological response in terms of rCR, partial response and disease progression/stable disease and about pCR were collected. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to analyze relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) based on radiological response in the overall population and after excluding patients with Luminal eBC. Comparisons between groups were performed with log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to determine independent predictive role of rCR for RFS and OS, corrected by age, lymph nodes status and pCR. Results: Overall, 120 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age at diagnosis of the study population was 49.4 ± 9.84 years. 58 patients (48.3%) had positive lymph nodes at diagnosis. 38 patients (31.7%) had triple negative BC (TNBC), 47 patients (39.1%) had HER2-positive BC, 35 patients (29.2%) had Luminal BC. Median follow up time was 49 months (IQR 42.1-58.8). At 48 months-follow up, 63.5% of patients without any CR, 96.3% of patients who achieved CR on both PET and bMRI and 97.4% of patients with CR on at least PET or bMRI were alive. Moreover, 47.6% of patients without any CR, 96.3% of patients who achieved CR on both PET and bMRI and 97.4% of patients with CR on at least PET or bMRI were recurrence-free. rCR on at least one radiological assessment was independently associated with better RFS [aHR 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09-0.62, p = 0.003)] and OS [aHR 0.24 (95% CI, 0.06-0.91, p = 0.035)]. No patients who failed to achieve rCR on both PET and bMRI achieved pCR. In TNBC, 13 out of 19 patients (68.4%) with CR on both PET/bMRI obtained pCR, 3 out of 9 patients (33.3%) with CR on at least PET or bMRI obtained pCR (p = 0.002). In HER2-positive BC, 20 out of 27 patients (74.1%) with CR on both PET/bMRI obtained pCR, 7 out of 16 patients (43.8%) with CR on at least PET or bMRI obtained pCR (p = 0.008). In Luminal BC, 3 out of 8 patients (37.5%) with CR on both PET/bMRI obtained pCR, 2 out of 14 patients (14.3%) with CR on at least PET or bMRI obtained pCR (p = 0.0058). Considering only the 85 patients affected by TNBC and HER2-positive BC, RFS and OS were statistically significantly better in patients with rCR on at least one radiological assessment [aHR 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.71, p = 0.011 and HR 0.16 (95% CI, 0.03-0.78, p = 0.024, respectively]. Conclusions: rCR on PET and/or bMRI following NACT is a strong prognostic marker for improved survival in eBC, particularly in TNBC and HER2-positive subtypes. This benefit appears to be independent of achieving pCR, highlighting the potential of imaging response as an additional tool for risk stratification and treatment decision-making in clinical practice. Citation Format: M. Corianò, C. Tommasi, G. Reni, A. Ingallinella, C. Tornali, F. Pratticò, M. Baronchelli, E. Cardinale, M. Scarlattei, C. Cidda, E. Spaggiari, E. Martella, G. Di Maria, A. Cosenza, D. Boggiani, D. Zanoni, C. D'Aloia, E. Silini, L. Ruffini, B. Pellegrino. Prognostic impact of PET and/or breast MRI radiological response in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-03.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-11-03
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-11-03: Prognostic impact of PET and/or breast MRI radiological response in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Elisa Cardinale, Giulio Di Maria, Matilde Coriano, Fabiana Pratticò et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Abstract PS4-11-03: Prognostic impact of PET and/or breast MRI radiological response in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Elisa Cardinale, Giulio Di Maria, Matilde Coriano, Fabiana Pratticò, Chiara Tommasi, Daniela Boggiani, Enrica Spaggiari, A. Ingallinella, Agnese Cosenza, Maura Scarlattei, Livia Ruffini, G. Reni, E. M. Martella, M. Baronchelli, C. D'Aloia, B. Pellegrino, C. Cidda, C. Tornali, D. Zanoni, E. Silini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the most relevant prognostic factor for patients with early breast cancer (eBC). However, the prognostic value of complete radiological response assessed by PET and/or breast MRI (bMRI) following NACT remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the potential prognostic significance of radiological complete response (rCR) in patients with eBC undergoing NACT. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with eBC receiving NACT at the University Hospital of Parma between 2018 and 2022. Data about radiological response in terms of rCR, partial response and disease progression/stable disease and about pCR were collected. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to analyze relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) based on radiological response in the overall population and after excluding patients with Luminal eBC. Comparisons between groups were performed with log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to determine independent predictive role of rCR for RFS and OS, corrected by age, lymph nodes status and pCR. Results: Overall, 120 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age at diagnosis of the study population was 49.4 ± 9.84 years. 58 patients (48.3%) had positive lymph nodes at diagnosis. 38 patients (31.7%) had triple negative BC (TNBC), 47 patients (39.1%) had HER2-positive BC, 35 patients (29.2%) had Luminal BC. Median follow up time was 49 months (IQR 42.1-58.8). At 48 months-follow up, 63.5% of patients without any CR, 96.3% of patients who achieved CR on both PET and bMRI and 97.4% of patients with CR on at least PET or bMRI were alive. Moreover, 47.6% of patients without any CR, 96.3% of patients who achieved CR on both PET and bMRI and 97.4% of patients with CR on at least PET or bMRI were recurrence-free. rCR on at least one radiological assessment was independently associated with better RFS [aHR 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09-0.62, p = 0.003)] and OS [aHR 0.24 (95% CI, 0.06-0.91, p = 0.035)]. No patients who failed to achieve rCR on both PET and bMRI achieved pCR. In TNBC, 13 out of 19 patients (68.4%) with CR on both PET/bMRI obtained pCR, 3 out of 9 patients (33.3%) with CR on at least PET or bMRI obtained pCR (p = 0.002). In HER2-positive BC, 20 out of 27 patients (74.1%) with CR on both PET/bMRI obtained pCR, 7 out of 16 patients (43.8%) with CR on at least PET or bMRI obtained pCR (p = 0.008). In Luminal BC, 3 out of 8 patients (37.5%) with CR on both PET/bMRI obtained pCR, 2 out of 14 patients (14.3%) with CR on at least PET or bMRI obtained pCR (p = 0.0058). Considering only the 85 patients affected by TNBC and HER2-positive BC, RFS and OS were statistically significantly better in patients with rCR on at least one radiological assessment [aHR 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.71, p = 0.011 and HR 0.16 (95% CI, 0.03-0.78, p = 0.024, respectively]. Conclusions: rCR on PET and/or bMRI following NACT is a strong prognostic marker for improved survival in eBC, particularly in TNBC and HER2-positive subtypes. This benefit appears to be independent of achieving pCR, highlighting the potential of imaging response as an additional tool for risk stratification and treatment decision-making in clinical practice. Citation Format: M. Corianò, C. Tommasi, G. Reni, A. Ingallinella, C. Tornali, F. Pratticò, M. Baronchelli, E. Cardinale, M. Scarlattei, C. Cidda, E. Spaggiari, E. Martella, G. Di Maria, A. Cosenza, D. Boggiani, D. Zanoni, C. D'Aloia, E. Silini, L. Ruffini, B. Pellegrino. Prognostic impact of PET and/or breast MRI radiological response in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-03.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
University of Parma (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.