Use of HIV Phylogenetic Analysis in Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Regulatory Considerations

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) phylogenetic analysis has been introduced in a select number of jurisdictions globally for the purposes of HIV public health surveillance. Using this epidemiological tool in this way can enhance public health efforts aimed at managing HIV transmission. This application, however, presents many legal and ethical concerns that may counter such efforts, particularly in regulatory environments where HIV transmission can be subject to criminal prosecution. This article uses Victoria, Australia, as a case study and analyses the current regulatory frameworks relevant to HIV transmission and explores how these may influence the future implementation of phylogenetic analysis in this setting. The article concludes by offering a series of regulatory recommendations including considerations relevant to law and policy reform; procedures and practice; education and guidance; and community engagement and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10496-7
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of HIV Phylogenetic Analysis in Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Regulatory Considerations

Jane Brophy, Louise Anne Keogh, Aaron Cogle, George Taiaroa et al.
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Use of HIV Phylogenetic Analysis in Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Regulatory Considerations

Jane Brophy, Louise Anne Keogh, Aaron Cogle, George Taiaroa, Doris Chibo, Mihaela Ivan, Richard D. Keane, Casey Michelle Haining, Williamson Dj, Jane S. Hocking
article en

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) phylogenetic analysis has been introduced in a select number of jurisdictions globally for the purposes of HIV public health surveillance. Using this epidemiological tool in this way can enhance public health efforts aimed at managing HIV transmission. This application, however, presents many legal and ethical concerns that may counter such efforts, particularly in regulatory environments where HIV transmission can be subject to criminal prosecution. This article uses Victoria, Australia, as a case study and analyses the current regulatory frameworks relevant to HIV transmission and explores how these may influence the future implementation of phylogenetic analysis in this setting. The article concludes by offering a series of regulatory recommendations including considerations relevant to law and policy reform; procedures and practice; education and guidance; and community engagement and research.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
The Alfred Hospital (AU), National Association of People with HIV Australia (AU), Department of Health and Human Services (AU), Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research (GB), Melbourne Health (AU), Coventry University (GB)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Use of HIV Phylogenetic Analysis in Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Regulatory Considerations — Jane Brophy, Louise Anne Keogh, et al. · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS