Abstract PS4-12-20: Regional Variation in Guideline Concordance for Women with Triple-Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancer in Nova Scotia

Abstract Background: Triple-negative (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers are associated with an elevated risk of metastatic tropism and poor outcomes. Since 2020, systemic neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been recommended for both forms of the disease when tumor size at diagnosis is equal to or over 2 cm. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion of patients in Nova Scotia (NS) with resectable TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer that received guideline concordant neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using 2021-2023 data from the NS Breast Screening Program. Adult patients (18-80 years) with an incident diagnosis of non-metastatic, ≥T2, triple negative or HER2+ breast cancer were considered theoretically eligible for NAT and included in the analysis. The neoadjuvant intervention was considered given if the patient had a wait-time of ≥4 months between tissue diagnosis and surgery. Our primary outcome was the proportion of theoretically eligible patients who received guideline-concordant NAT. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who experienced a pathologic complete response (pCR). Receipt of guideline concordant care was compared over time (2021-2023) and between health system administrative zones (Central, Western, Northern, Eastern). Results: A total of 291 women were included, with a median age of 59 (IQR: 48-67). Forty-five percent were treated in the Central Zone. Of the cohort, 49.5% were TNBC and 50.52% were HER2+. Overall, 64.6% of eligible patients appear to have received NAT. There were differences in receipt of NAT between administrative zones (Central 70.8%, Eastern 69.5%, Northern 55.6%, Western 52.1%, p=0.046). The overall pCR for the cohort was 37.8% and the response was consistent across the zones (% range: 34.2%-40.0%, p=0.951). Conclusion: This study highlights regional disparities in the adherence to NAT guidelines for TNBC and HER2+ breast cancers. Future efforts should focus on strategies to improve NAT guideline adherence, which will improve outcomes for NS breast cancer patients. Citation Format: H. Stewart, A. Mayo, T. Li, R. Hemsworth, G. Knapp, A. Drohan. Regional Variation in Guideline Concordance for Women with Triple-Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancer in Nova Scotia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-12-20.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-12-20
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-12-20: Regional Variation in Guideline Concordance for Women with Triple-Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancer in Nova Scotia

AE Drohan, H. Stewart, A. Mayo, R. Hemsworth et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS4-12-20: Regional Variation in Guideline Concordance for Women with Triple-Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancer in Nova Scotia

AE Drohan, H. Stewart, A. Mayo, R. Hemsworth, G. Knapp, T. Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Triple-negative (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers are associated with an elevated risk of metastatic tropism and poor outcomes. Since 2020, systemic neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been recommended for both forms of the disease when tumor size at diagnosis is equal to or over 2 cm. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion of patients in Nova Scotia (NS) with resectable TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer that received guideline concordant neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using 2021-2023 data from the NS Breast Screening Program. Adult patients (18-80 years) with an incident diagnosis of non-metastatic, ≥T2, triple negative or HER2+ breast cancer were considered theoretically eligible for NAT and included in the analysis. The neoadjuvant intervention was considered given if the patient had a wait-time of ≥4 months between tissue diagnosis and surgery. Our primary outcome was the proportion of theoretically eligible patients who received guideline-concordant NAT. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who experienced a pathologic complete response (pCR). Receipt of guideline concordant care was compared over time (2021-2023) and between health system administrative zones (Central, Western, Northern, Eastern). Results: A total of 291 women were included, with a median age of 59 (IQR: 48-67). Forty-five percent were treated in the Central Zone. Of the cohort, 49.5% were TNBC and 50.52% were HER2+. Overall, 64.6% of eligible patients appear to have received NAT. There were differences in receipt of NAT between administrative zones (Central 70.8%, Eastern 69.5%, Northern 55.6%, Western 52.1%, p=0.046). The overall pCR for the cohort was 37.8% and the response was consistent across the zones (% range: 34.2%-40.0%, p=0.951). Conclusion: This study highlights regional disparities in the adherence to NAT guidelines for TNBC and HER2+ breast cancers. Future efforts should focus on strategies to improve NAT guideline adherence, which will improve outcomes for NS breast cancer patients. Citation Format: H. Stewart, A. Mayo, T. Li, R. Hemsworth, G. Knapp, A. Drohan. Regional Variation in Guideline Concordance for Women with Triple-Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancer in Nova Scotia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-12-20.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.