Abstract PS3-11-10: Neoadjuvant HSP90 inhibition with ganetespib significantly improves distant relapse-free survival in I-SPY2 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency

Abstract Introduction: The I-SPY2 neoadjuvant platform trial (NCT01042379) evaluates new therapies in high molecular risk, stage 2-3 breast cancer patients. Between 2010 and 2022, 24 therapies were tested in 2,117 patients. One-third of these patients had HER2-negative tumors with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency (DRD) (HER2-/Immune-/DRD- subtype). These patients had very low pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (∼10% on average) across all treatment and control arms. We performed a high-throughput drug screen (n=386 compounds) in triple-negative (TN), immune-low, DRD-low breast cancer patient-derived organoids with confirmed in vitro resistance to platinum chemotherapy to identify effective treatments for this tumor type. HSP90 inhibitors, including ganetespib, were one of the most potent drug classes in the screen. HSP90 is an abundant chaperone protein involved in the folding of oncoproteins under basal conditions and during stress response. Neoadjuvant ganetespib was tested in I-SPY2 in combination with standard chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer but did not meaningfully improve pCR rates (PMID 36456573). Here, we re-evaluate the ganetespib arm by Response Predictive Subtypes with 5-year median follow-up data, focused on patients with breast tumors of the HER2-/Immune-/DRD- subtype. Methods: HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients (N=221; 79% HR+, 21% TN) and HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+ patients (N=219; 32% HR+, 68% TN) were randomized to neoadjuvant ganetespib (150 mg/m2 ganetespib every 3 weeks with paclitaxel, then doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC)) (n=38 HER2-/Immune-/DRD- and n=55 HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+), or standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy control (paclitaxel-AC) (n=183 HER2-/Immune-/DRD- and n=164 HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+). The primary endpoint, pCR, was defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and regional nodes at surgery. Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, with hazard ratios (HR) estimated by Cox regression. Residual cancer burden (RCB) and serial MRI-based functional tumor volume (FTV) were collected as investigational early measures of treatment efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting. Results: In HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients, pCR rates were low in the ganetespib and control arms (13% vs. 9%), compared with 38% vs. 31%, respectively, in HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+ patients. In both subtypes, patients who achieved a pCR with either treatment had excellent DRFS (100% at 5 years). Interestingly, in HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients treated with ganetespib with no pCR (n=32), we observed only 1 DRFS event, compared with 35 DRFS events in HER2-/Immune-/DRD- control-treated patients with no pCR (n=166); HR 0.12 (95% CI 0.02-0.90; p-value: 0.039). The respective DRFS at 5 years was 96% with ganetespib vs. 77% with control, showing a significantly improved DRFS with neoadjuvant ganetespib for HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients, despite their non-pCR. This treatment effect remained significant when adjusted for hormone receptor status. Among non-pCR patients, RCB measure and FTV decrease explained a portion of ganetespib’s significant DRFS benefit. In contrast, ganetespib did not improve DRFS in HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+ patients compared with control. Conclusion: Our data suggest a promising role for ganetespib in improving long-term outcomes for patients with HER2-/Immune-/DRD- tumors, which account for 38% of all molecularly high-risk breast cancers, even in the absence of a pathologic complete response. Continuous measures of RCB and FTV may serve as early predictors of ganetespib’s long-term survival benefit in HER2-/Immune/-DRD- patients. Citation Format: T. B. V. Bui, D. M. Wolf, C. Yau, R. W. Sayaman, K. Chow, S. W. Choi, M. C. Bruck, K. Santos-Parker, A. M. Glas, J. E. Lang, A. Forero-Torres, L. Brown-Swigart, G. L. Hirst, E. F. Petricoin, J. Perlmutter, W. F. Symmans, P. R. Pohlmann, D. Yee, L. Pusztai, I-SPY investigators, N. M. Hylton, A. M. DeMichele, J. M. Rosenbluth, L. J. Esserman, L. J. Van 'T Veer. Neoadjuvant HSP90 inhibition with ganetespib significantly improves distant relapse-free survival in I-SPY2 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-11-10.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-11-10
Primary Topic
Heat shock proteins research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-11-10: Neoadjuvant HSP90 inhibition with ganetespib significantly improves distant relapse-free survival in I-SPY2 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency

Andres Forero‐Torres, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Jane Perlmutter, Kingsley Chow et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Heat shock proteins research
article

Abstract PS3-11-10: Neoadjuvant HSP90 inhibition with ganetespib significantly improves distant relapse-free survival in I-SPY2 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency

Andres Forero‐Torres, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Jane Perlmutter, Kingsley Chow, CC Yau, K. Santos-Parker, A. M. Glas, T. B. V. Bui, R. W. Sayaman, L. Pusztai, J. E. Lang, N. M. Hylton, S. W. Choi, J. M. Rosenbluth, E. F. Petricoin, I-SPY Investigators, M. C. Bruck, L. J. Esserman, A. M. DeMichele, G. L. Hirst, D. Yee, L. J. van 't Veer, D. M. Wolf, W. F. Symmans, P. R. Pohlmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The I-SPY2 neoadjuvant platform trial (NCT01042379) evaluates new therapies in high molecular risk, stage 2-3 breast cancer patients. Between 2010 and 2022, 24 therapies were tested in 2,117 patients. One-third of these patients had HER2-negative tumors with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency (DRD) (HER2-/Immune-/DRD- subtype). These patients had very low pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (∼10% on average) across all treatment and control arms. We performed a high-throughput drug screen (n=386 compounds) in triple-negative (TN), immune-low, DRD-low breast cancer patient-derived organoids with confirmed in vitro resistance to platinum chemotherapy to identify effective treatments for this tumor type. HSP90 inhibitors, including ganetespib, were one of the most potent drug classes in the screen. HSP90 is an abundant chaperone protein involved in the folding of oncoproteins under basal conditions and during stress response. Neoadjuvant ganetespib was tested in I-SPY2 in combination with standard chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer but did not meaningfully improve pCR rates (PMID 36456573). Here, we re-evaluate the ganetespib arm by Response Predictive Subtypes with 5-year median follow-up data, focused on patients with breast tumors of the HER2-/Immune-/DRD- subtype. Methods: HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients (N=221; 79% HR+, 21% TN) and HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+ patients (N=219; 32% HR+, 68% TN) were randomized to neoadjuvant ganetespib (150 mg/m2 ganetespib every 3 weeks with paclitaxel, then doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC)) (n=38 HER2-/Immune-/DRD- and n=55 HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+), or standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy control (paclitaxel-AC) (n=183 HER2-/Immune-/DRD- and n=164 HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+). The primary endpoint, pCR, was defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and regional nodes at surgery. Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, with hazard ratios (HR) estimated by Cox regression. Residual cancer burden (RCB) and serial MRI-based functional tumor volume (FTV) were collected as investigational early measures of treatment efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting. Results: In HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients, pCR rates were low in the ganetespib and control arms (13% vs. 9%), compared with 38% vs. 31%, respectively, in HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+ patients. In both subtypes, patients who achieved a pCR with either treatment had excellent DRFS (100% at 5 years). Interestingly, in HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients treated with ganetespib with no pCR (n=32), we observed only 1 DRFS event, compared with 35 DRFS events in HER2-/Immune-/DRD- control-treated patients with no pCR (n=166); HR 0.12 (95% CI 0.02-0.90; p-value: 0.039). The respective DRFS at 5 years was 96% with ganetespib vs. 77% with control, showing a significantly improved DRFS with neoadjuvant ganetespib for HER2-/Immune-/DRD- patients, despite their non-pCR. This treatment effect remained significant when adjusted for hormone receptor status. Among non-pCR patients, RCB measure and FTV decrease explained a portion of ganetespib’s significant DRFS benefit. In contrast, ganetespib did not improve DRFS in HER2-/Immune+ and/or DRD+ patients compared with control. Conclusion: Our data suggest a promising role for ganetespib in improving long-term outcomes for patients with HER2-/Immune-/DRD- tumors, which account for 38% of all molecularly high-risk breast cancers, even in the absence of a pathologic complete response. Continuous measures of RCB and FTV may serve as early predictors of ganetespib’s long-term survival benefit in HER2-/Immune/-DRD- patients. Citation Format: T. B. V. Bui, D. M. Wolf, C. Yau, R. W. Sayaman, K. Chow, S. W. Choi, M. C. Bruck, K. Santos-Parker, A. M. Glas, J. E. Lang, A. Forero-Torres, L. Brown-Swigart, G. L. Hirst, E. F. Petricoin, J. Perlmutter, W. F. Symmans, P. R. Pohlmann, D. Yee, L. Pusztai, I-SPY investigators, N. M. Hylton, A. M. DeMichele, J. M. Rosenbluth, L. J. Esserman, L. J. Van 'T Veer. Neoadjuvant HSP90 inhibition with ganetespib significantly improves distant relapse-free survival in I-SPY2 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer with low expression of immune genes and no DNA repair deficiency [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-11-10.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
University of Minnesota (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), George Mason University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of New Haven (US), Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative (US), Kirklin Clinic (US), Gemini Computers (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Heat shock proteins research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.