Application and Delphi Validation of an Omaha System–Based Evaluation Index for Post-PCI Rehabilitation Nursing

Lili Wu,1 Yahui Gong,1 Xueli Liu,1 Yaqian Ning,1 Jianlan Song,1 Zhifu Zhang,1 Hairong Zhou,1 Haiyan Xiong2 1General Medicine Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Haiyan Xiong, Nursing Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, No. 38 Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13713832572, Email [email protected] Hairong Zhou, General Medicine Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, No. 38 Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-15012613566, Email [email protected]: This study aimed to develop an evaluation index system based on the Omaha System to identify postoperative rehabilitation nursing problems in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This evaluation system aims to facilitate the timely identification of nursing problems and enhance the reliability of nursing interventions during postoperative rehabilitation.Methods: Rehabilitation nursing problems were identified through a comprehensive literature review and case analysis, considering both the physical and psychological characteristics of post-PCI patients. These problems were classified and organized according to the Omaha System. From September 2020 to February 2021, Delphi consultations were conducted with experts in China to finalize the evaluation indicators.Results: After two rounds of expert consultation, the authority coefficients of the experts were 0.858 and 0.875, and Kendall’s W coefficients were 0.194 and 0.150, respectively (both P < 0.01), indicating consensus. The final evaluation index system comprised 4 first-level indicators (domains), 21 second-level indicators (nursing problems), and 130 third-level indicators (specific symptoms/signs).Conclusion: The Omaha System-based evaluation index developed in this study offers a clinically applicable framework for identifying and managing rehabilitation nursing problems in PCI patients. Supporting comprehensive and systematic assessment provides nurses with clear guidance for problem recognition, individualized care planning, and outcome monitoring. Its application has the potential to enhance care consistency, improve patient recovery, and promote evidence-based nursing decision-making, thereby contributing to improved quality of post-PCI rehabilitation care in clinical practice.Keywords: coronary heart disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, Omaha System, index system, Delphi method, cardiovascular nursing, nursing care

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-02-01
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application and Delphi Validation of an Omaha System–Based Evaluation Index for Post-PCI Rehabilitation Nursing

H Xiong, Z Zhang, Wu L, Ning Y et al.
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Application and Delphi Validation of an Omaha System–Based Evaluation Index for Post-PCI Rehabilitation Nursing

H Xiong, Z Zhang, Wu L, Ning Y, Gong Y, Liu X, Song J, Zhou H
article en

Abstract

Lili Wu,1 Yahui Gong,1 Xueli Liu,1 Yaqian Ning,1 Jianlan Song,1 Zhifu Zhang,1 Hairong Zhou,1 Haiyan Xiong2 1General Medicine Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Haiyan Xiong, Nursing Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, No. 38 Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13713832572, Email [email protected] Hairong Zhou, General Medicine Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, No. 38 Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-15012613566, Email [email protected]: This study aimed to develop an evaluation index system based on the Omaha System to identify postoperative rehabilitation nursing problems in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This evaluation system aims to facilitate the timely identification of nursing problems and enhance the reliability of nursing interventions during postoperative rehabilitation.Methods: Rehabilitation nursing problems were identified through a comprehensive literature review and case analysis, considering both the physical and psychological characteristics of post-PCI patients. These problems were classified and organized according to the Omaha System. From September 2020 to February 2021, Delphi consultations were conducted with experts in China to finalize the evaluation indicators.Results: After two rounds of expert consultation, the authority coefficients of the experts were 0.858 and 0.875, and Kendall’s W coefficients were 0.194 and 0.150, respectively (both P < 0.01), indicating consensus. The final evaluation index system comprised 4 first-level indicators (domains), 21 second-level indicators (nursing problems), and 130 third-level indicators (specific symptoms/signs).Conclusion: The Omaha System-based evaluation index developed in this study offers a clinically applicable framework for identifying and managing rehabilitation nursing problems in PCI patients. Supporting comprehensive and systematic assessment provides nurses with clear guidance for problem recognition, individualized care planning, and outcome monitoring. Its application has the potential to enhance care consistency, improve patient recovery, and promote evidence-based nursing decision-making, thereby contributing to improved quality of post-PCI rehabilitation care in clinical practice.Keywords: coronary heart disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, Omaha System, index system, Delphi method, cardiovascular nursing, nursing care

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.