<i>Like</i> – a morphological evaluative loan marker in German?

Abstract The paper examines whether the borrowed constituent - like in German adjectives such as bilderbuchlike ‘storybook-like’ and Aschenbrödel - like ‘Cinderella-like’ qualifies as an evaluative or, more specifically, approximative marker. Similative items such as like are an important source of approximation. However, it is argued that similarity and comparison alone are not sufficient for establishing approximation. With regard to both the relationship between evaluation and approximation as well as the significance of the concept of approximation for morphological theory in general, the paper argues that it is necessary to define approximation narrowly and, in particular, to distinguish it from other forms of comparison in word-formation. To this end, similative items from English, French, and Italian that have previously been analysed as approximative markers in the literature are examined. The paper concludes that under the conditions specified here, German - like cannot be considered an approximative or evaluative marker.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Linguistica
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2025-0125
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Like – a morphological evaluative loan marker in German?

Barbara Schlücker
Folia Linguistica
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Like – a morphological evaluative loan marker in German?

Barbara Schlücker
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper examines whether the borrowed constituent - like in German adjectives such as bilderbuchlike ‘storybook-like’ and Aschenbrödel - like ‘Cinderella-like’ qualifies as an evaluative or, more specifically, approximative marker. Similative items such as like are an important source of approximation. However, it is argued that similarity and comparison alone are not sufficient for establishing approximation. With regard to both the relationship between evaluation and approximation as well as the significance of the concept of approximation for morphological theory in general, the paper argues that it is necessary to define approximation narrowly and, in particular, to distinguish it from other forms of comparison in word-formation. To this end, similative items from English, French, and Italian that have previously been analysed as approximative markers in the literature are examined. The paper concludes that under the conditions specified here, German - like cannot be considered an approximative or evaluative marker.

Folia Linguistica
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.