Algorithms have algorithm aversion

Purpose This study investigates the phenomenon of algorithm aversion in AI systems. We examine whether AI agents exhibit preferences or aversions to algorithm-generated advice and explores how this aligns with or diverges from human behaviour in similar decision-making contexts. Design/methodology/approach The research replicates three seminal studies on algorithm aversion using GPT models as participants. Scenarios span forecasting tasks, advice-weighting experiments and healthcare recommendations. Findings GPT models exhibit algorithm aversion, preferring human advice over algorithmic inputs. However, the mechanisms driving this behaviour differ from humans. While humans resist algorithmic advice due to biases like uniqueness neglect, GPT models show a broader aversion rooted in performance comparisons. Model version and temperature also influence these preferences. Originality/value This study extends the understanding of algorithm aversion beyond human contexts to AI systems. By systematically comparing human and GPT behaviours, it highlights differences in how aversion manifests, providing insights for designing AI systems that integrate human and algorithmic inputs effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-01-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithms have algorithm aversion

Sam Kirshner, Richard Vidgen, Michael J. Cahalane, Naz Guler
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Algorithms have algorithm aversion

Sam Kirshner, Richard Vidgen, Michael J. Cahalane, Naz Guler
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the phenomenon of algorithm aversion in AI systems. We examine whether AI agents exhibit preferences or aversions to algorithm-generated advice and explores how this aligns with or diverges from human behaviour in similar decision-making contexts. Design/methodology/approach The research replicates three seminal studies on algorithm aversion using GPT models as participants. Scenarios span forecasting tasks, advice-weighting experiments and healthcare recommendations. Findings GPT models exhibit algorithm aversion, preferring human advice over algorithmic inputs. However, the mechanisms driving this behaviour differ from humans. While humans resist algorithmic advice due to biases like uniqueness neglect, GPT models show a broader aversion rooted in performance comparisons. Model version and temperature also influence these preferences. Originality/value This study extends the understanding of algorithm aversion beyond human contexts to AI systems. By systematically comparing human and GPT behaviours, it highlights differences in how aversion manifests, providing insights for designing AI systems that integrate human and algorithmic inputs effectively.

Industrial Management & Data Systems
UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Clinic (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.