Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 1: Identifying Artifacts and Avoiding Misdiagnosis

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) offers excellent negative predictive value for ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD); however, several interpretative pitfalls can lead to diagnostic errors including false-negative, false-positive results or inaccurate estimation of degree of stenosis. These errors may influence patient management, prompt unnecessary or missed downstream testing, and ultimately affect clinical outcomes. This two-part article reviews the most common sources of diagnostic inaccuracy in CCTA through case-based examples. Part I highlights factors that contribute to missed or overdiagnosed coronary lesions while Part II focuses on pitfalls that lead to underestimation or overestimation of stenosis severity and outlines practical strategies to mitigate these errors. Recognizing the inherent limitations of CCTA and employing a systematic, structured interpretive approach are essential for preserving its high diagnostic accuracy and ensuring optimal patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251413217
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 1: Identifying Artifacts and Avoiding Misdiagnosis

Maya Wiessman, Zeynep S. Aslan, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Arzu Canan
1 citations
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
31.92
article

Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 1: Identifying Artifacts and Avoiding Misdiagnosis

Maya Wiessman, Zeynep S. Aslan, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Arzu Canan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) offers excellent negative predictive value for ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD); however, several interpretative pitfalls can lead to diagnostic errors including false-negative, false-positive results or inaccurate estimation of degree of stenosis. These errors may influence patient management, prompt unnecessary or missed downstream testing, and ultimately affect clinical outcomes. This two-part article reviews the most common sources of diagnostic inaccuracy in CCTA through case-based examples. Part I highlights factors that contribute to missed or overdiagnosed coronary lesions while Part II focuses on pitfalls that lead to underestimation or overestimation of stenosis severity and outlines practical strategies to mitigate these errors. Recognizing the inherent limitations of CCTA and employing a systematic, structured interpretive approach are essential for preserving its high diagnostic accuracy and ensuring optimal patient care.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Mayo Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Advanced Imaging Research (United States) (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.