A Life-Stage Comparative Study of the Psychosocial Care Burdens and Needs of Middle-Aged and Older Family Carers in Home Care

Population aging has increased reliance on family carers, whose psychosocial burdens and support needs vary by life stage. This exploratory study aimed to compare psychosocial care burdens and support needs between middle-aged family carers (MFCs) and older family carers (OFCs) providing home-based care in Japan from a life-stage perspective. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among family carers registered with a community general support center in Sapporo, Japan. Data from 153 respondents were analyzed. Psychosocial care burden was assessed across perceived burden, underlying causes, and broader life challenges. Support needs were evaluated based on preferences for 20 types of services and supports. Overall, 60% of MFCs and 53.9% of OFCs experienced care burden. MFCs reported significantly greater burdens related to family relationships (Cramer’s V = 0.168) and work-related concerns (Cramer’s V = 0.235). They also expressed higher needs for Care Leave Accessibility, Flexible Work for Care, and Carer Job Support, with small-to-moderate effect sizes. The findings suggest that psychosocial burdens and support needs among family carers may vary across different age-defined life stages. Middle-aged carers balancing work and family responsibilities face distinct challenges, underscoring the need for targeted policies, workplace support, and life-stage-responsive, role-sensitive support systems in aging societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020129
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Life-Stage Comparative Study of the Psychosocial Care Burdens and Needs of Middle-Aged and Older Family Carers in Home Care

Etsuko Tadaka, Ayuka Yokoyama, Nanami Oe, Yūko Tanaka et al.
Social Sciences
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

A Life-Stage Comparative Study of the Psychosocial Care Burdens and Needs of Middle-Aged and Older Family Carers in Home Care

Etsuko Tadaka, Ayuka Yokoyama, Nanami Oe, Yūko Tanaka, Yuka Iwata
article en

Abstract

Population aging has increased reliance on family carers, whose psychosocial burdens and support needs vary by life stage. This exploratory study aimed to compare psychosocial care burdens and support needs between middle-aged family carers (MFCs) and older family carers (OFCs) providing home-based care in Japan from a life-stage perspective. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among family carers registered with a community general support center in Sapporo, Japan. Data from 153 respondents were analyzed. Psychosocial care burden was assessed across perceived burden, underlying causes, and broader life challenges. Support needs were evaluated based on preferences for 20 types of services and supports. Overall, 60% of MFCs and 53.9% of OFCs experienced care burden. MFCs reported significantly greater burdens related to family relationships (Cramer’s V = 0.168) and work-related concerns (Cramer’s V = 0.235). They also expressed higher needs for Care Leave Accessibility, Flexible Work for Care, and Carer Job Support, with small-to-moderate effect sizes. The findings suggest that psychosocial burdens and support needs among family carers may vary across different age-defined life stages. Middle-aged carers balancing work and family responsibilities face distinct challenges, underscoring the need for targeted policies, workplace support, and life-stage-responsive, role-sensitive support systems in aging societies.

Social SciencesVol. 15(2)
Hokkaido University (JP), Hokkaido Institute of Public Health (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.