Psychological Disorder and Patient Satisfaction in Aesthetic Surgery—A Systematic Review

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This systematic review investigates the relationship between preoperative psychological disorders and postoperative satisfaction among patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. While aesthetic procedures can enhance self-image, growing evidence indicates that underlying mental health conditions, particularly BDD, depression, and anxiety, may compromise surgical outcomes. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar between January 2010 and December 2024. Eligible observational studies assessed preoperative psychological conditions-primarily body dysmorphic disorder, depression, and anxiety-using validated instruments, such as the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ), Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination (BDDE), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and structured clinical interviews, and reported postoperative patient-reported satisfaction following aesthetic surgery. Study quality was evaluated using an adapted QUIPS framework. <i>Results</i>: Across the 13 included studies, six reported a negative association between moderate-to-severe preoperative psychological symptoms and postoperative satisfaction, five found no significant association, and two described positive or conditional associations. Methodological heterogeneity in psychological assessment tools and satisfaction measures was a major source of divergence across studies. Despite these differences, the evidence underscores the need for standardized, validated psychological evaluation protocols in aesthetic surgery. Incorporating mental health screening into routine surgical planning can enhance ethical practice, reduce dissatisfaction, and improve long-term patient outcomes. <i>Conclusions</i>: These findings advocate for a multidisciplinary approach that includes psychological assessment as an essential component of patient care in aesthetic medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62020389
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Disorder and Patient Satisfaction in Aesthetic Surgery—A Systematic Review

Teodora Anghel, Leonardo Corsaro, N Ivanović, Lavinia Hogea et al.
1 citations
Medicina
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
44.11
article

Psychological Disorder and Patient Satisfaction in Aesthetic Surgery—A Systematic Review

Teodora Anghel, Leonardo Corsaro, N Ivanović, Lavinia Hogea, Iuliana Florina Costea, Amalia Marinca, Brenda Bernad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This systematic review investigates the relationship between preoperative psychological disorders and postoperative satisfaction among patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. While aesthetic procedures can enhance self-image, growing evidence indicates that underlying mental health conditions, particularly BDD, depression, and anxiety, may compromise surgical outcomes. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar between January 2010 and December 2024. Eligible observational studies assessed preoperative psychological conditions-primarily body dysmorphic disorder, depression, and anxiety-using validated instruments, such as the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ), Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination (BDDE), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and structured clinical interviews, and reported postoperative patient-reported satisfaction following aesthetic surgery. Study quality was evaluated using an adapted QUIPS framework. <i>Results</i>: Across the 13 included studies, six reported a negative association between moderate-to-severe preoperative psychological symptoms and postoperative satisfaction, five found no significant association, and two described positive or conditional associations. Methodological heterogeneity in psychological assessment tools and satisfaction measures was a major source of divergence across studies. Despite these differences, the evidence underscores the need for standardized, validated psychological evaluation protocols in aesthetic surgery. Incorporating mental health screening into routine surgical planning can enhance ethical practice, reduce dissatisfaction, and improve long-term patient outcomes. <i>Conclusions</i>: These findings advocate for a multidisciplinary approach that includes psychological assessment as an essential component of patient care in aesthetic medicine.

MedicinaVol. 62(2)
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), West University of Timişoara (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), Tibiscus University of Timișoara (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
44.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.