Bank deserts in the USA, 2015–2023: change and continuity

Purpose The purpose of this study is to study bank deserts, their location and characteristics, using pre- and post-pandemic data, with aggregation to communities (i.e. PUMAs) with approximately 100,000 residents. Design/Methodology/Approach The study uses traditional FDIC data to measure bank deserts at the census tract level in 2015 and 2023, correcting for population density and land area, with 10% cutoffs, separately for metro and rural areas. Deserts are aggregated to PUMAs and compared for population characteristics drawn from the American Community Survey. Comparisons across counties and states are provided. Findings Bank deserts expanded by approximately one-third from 2015 to 2023, while the characteristics of deserts remained largely unchanged. In rural areas, bank deserts are consistently related to socioeconomic disadvantage, such as poverty, a lack of income, ethnic/racial minorities and Indian reservations, but the pattern is less consistent in metropolitan areas, where they are negatively related to African Americans and Hispanics and unrelated to poverty. Indeed, numerous deserts exist in relatively affluent metro areas. Research limitations/implications The PUMA-level approach allowed identification of bank deserts in more granular communities relative to, for example, counties or cities. As a result, although most severe metro bank deserts appear in Southern states, two notable 2023 deserts were found in the Bronx, NYC. Of greater import, in contrast to some earlier studies, we find that metro deserts are not significantly related to disadvantage, likely due to the expansion of online banking. Social implications We conclude that efforts to counter bank deserts should target deserts in disadvantaged communities rather than bank deserts in general. Originality/Value The PUMA-level approach allowed identification of bank deserts in more granular communities relative to, e.g. counties or cities. As a result, although most severe metro bank deserts appear in Southern states, two notable 2023 deserts were found in the Bronx, NYC. Of greater import, in contrast to some earlier studies, we found that metro deserts are not significantly related to disadvantage, likely due to the expansion of on-line banking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Finance
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-08-2025-0595
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank deserts in the USA, 2015–2023: change and continuity

Russ Kashian, Robert Drago
Managerial Finance
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Bank deserts in the USA, 2015–2023: change and continuity

Russ Kashian, Robert Drago
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to study bank deserts, their location and characteristics, using pre- and post-pandemic data, with aggregation to communities (i.e. PUMAs) with approximately 100,000 residents. Design/Methodology/Approach The study uses traditional FDIC data to measure bank deserts at the census tract level in 2015 and 2023, correcting for population density and land area, with 10% cutoffs, separately for metro and rural areas. Deserts are aggregated to PUMAs and compared for population characteristics drawn from the American Community Survey. Comparisons across counties and states are provided. Findings Bank deserts expanded by approximately one-third from 2015 to 2023, while the characteristics of deserts remained largely unchanged. In rural areas, bank deserts are consistently related to socioeconomic disadvantage, such as poverty, a lack of income, ethnic/racial minorities and Indian reservations, but the pattern is less consistent in metropolitan areas, where they are negatively related to African Americans and Hispanics and unrelated to poverty. Indeed, numerous deserts exist in relatively affluent metro areas. Research limitations/implications The PUMA-level approach allowed identification of bank deserts in more granular communities relative to, for example, counties or cities. As a result, although most severe metro bank deserts appear in Southern states, two notable 2023 deserts were found in the Bronx, NYC. Of greater import, in contrast to some earlier studies, we find that metro deserts are not significantly related to disadvantage, likely due to the expansion of online banking. Social implications We conclude that efforts to counter bank deserts should target deserts in disadvantaged communities rather than bank deserts in general. Originality/Value The PUMA-level approach allowed identification of bank deserts in more granular communities relative to, e.g. counties or cities. As a result, although most severe metro bank deserts appear in Southern states, two notable 2023 deserts were found in the Bronx, NYC. Of greater import, in contrast to some earlier studies, we found that metro deserts are not significantly related to disadvantage, likely due to the expansion of on-line banking.

Managerial Finance
University of Wisconsin–Whitewater (US), Precision for Medicine (United States) (US), Precision Research (United States) (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.