Contemporary methods for surgical margin assessment in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
This study offers a comprehensive evaluation of intraoperative surgical margin assessment techniques employed during radical prostatectomy. Evidence from the NeuroSAFE randomized controlled trial confirms the clinical utility of this protocol, while our findings demonstrate that confocal microscopy provides comparable diagnostic performance. Collectively, these results support their broader clinical implementation. Nonetheless, definitive conclusions will require higher-quality evidence and standardized reporting in future research.
Authors
- Joan palou
- Giulio Avesani
- P. Verri
- JOSEP GAYÀ
- Wojciech Tomczak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1073-0797)
- Jordi Huguet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-4833)
- Alberto Breda
- Andrea Gallioli
- Laura MAS
- Francesco DI BELLO
- Wojciech KRAJEWSKI
Institutions
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
- Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
- Puigvert Foundation (ES)
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (ES)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Minerva Urology and Nephrology
- Published
- 2026-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6051.25.06642-x
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00