Influence of detector type on object position measurement in optical tweezers

Determining the optical potential is one of the crucial aspects of the analysis and control of optical tweezers. It requires finding the scale factor of displacements in an optical tweezer recording, which typically is hard to obtain directly through a photodetector, and instead is usually done by fitting the statistical features of the data to the Langevin dynamics predictions. We argue that this procedure is harder for measurements made using a Segmented Quadrant Detector, for which these scale factors can vary along different axes due to image distortions. Subsequently, it can lead to a false recognition of the potential’s anisotropy. We quantify this phenomenon by comparing simultaneous measurements from a Segmented Quadrant Detector and a camera, as well as from the 2D Lateral Effect Detector and a camera. We then discuss which experimental and data analysis techniques should be used to properly determine the geometry of the optical potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.588576
Primary Topic
Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of detector type on object position measurement in optical tweezers

Jakub Ślęzak, Sławomir Drobczyński, Aleksandra K. Korzeniewska
Optics Express
Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
article

Influence of detector type on object position measurement in optical tweezers

Jakub Ślęzak, Sławomir Drobczyński, Aleksandra K. Korzeniewska
article en

Abstract

Determining the optical potential is one of the crucial aspects of the analysis and control of optical tweezers. It requires finding the scale factor of displacements in an optical tweezer recording, which typically is hard to obtain directly through a photodetector, and instead is usually done by fitting the statistical features of the data to the Langevin dynamics predictions. We argue that this procedure is harder for measurements made using a Segmented Quadrant Detector, for which these scale factors can vary along different axes due to image distortions. Subsequently, it can lead to a false recognition of the potential’s anisotropy. We quantify this phenomenon by comparing simultaneous measurements from a Segmented Quadrant Detector and a camera, as well as from the 2D Lateral Effect Detector and a camera. We then discuss which experimental and data analysis techniques should be used to properly determine the geometry of the optical potential.

Optics ExpressVol. 34(6)
University of Applied Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.