Genetic Insights into Enteric Methane Emissions in Indoor-Fed Growing Cattle

Despite increasing interest in the genetic selection of ruminants for reduced enteric methane emissions, uncertainty remains on which methane trait definitions best reflect the exploitable genetic variation independent of traits already included in national cattle breeding programs. The present study aimed to explore the genetic variability in a range of methane-related traits in growing beef cattle and quantify the proportion of genetic variance in daily methane production that is independent of performance traits such as feed intake, growth, and body size. Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were measured using GreenFeed systems on 1,700 growing crossbred beef cattle from a commercial feedlot. Performance traits, including energy intake, feeding behavior, liveweight, live animal ultrasound, subjective skeletal and muscular scores, and slaughter data were also available. Thirteen methane traits were generated, comprising daily methane production, five ratio traits, and seven residual methane production (RMP) traits, each statistically adjusted for different combinations of energy intake, liveweight, average daily gain (ADG), and carcass weight. Genetic parameters were estimated using animal linear mixed models. Daily methane production was moderately heritable (0.42 ± 0.09), with a genetic standard deviation of 23.43 g/d. Daily methane production exhibited moderate genetic correlations with feed intake (0.51), ADG (0.39), metabolic liveweight (0.27), and carcass weight (0.42). These correlations suggest commonalities in the genetic architecture between methane production and traits related to feed intake, body size and growth rate. Genetic adjustment of daily methane production for these traits resulted in a 25% reduction in the genetic standard deviation (from 23.43 g/d to 17.55 g/d), with only 56% of daily methane productions genetic variance remaining independent of the performance traits. Heritability estimates for the RMP traits ranged from 0.38 ± 0.09 to 0.46 ± 0.09, and their genetic correlations with daily methane production remained strongly positive (>0.84). These results suggest that while genetic selection can reduce methane emissions in growing beef cattle, a substantial portion of the genetic variation in daily enteric methane emissions overlaps with traits already under selection. Thus, consideration needs to be given to the genetic correlations between methane emissions and other traits already under selection when attempting to quantify the cost benefit of genetically selecting on methane emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag046
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic Insights into Enteric Methane Emissions in Indoor-Fed Growing Cattle

Clodagh V Ryan, R.D. Evans, Deirdre C. Purfield, Stephen Conroy et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Genetic Insights into Enteric Methane Emissions in Indoor-Fed Growing Cattle

Clodagh V Ryan, R.D. Evans, Deirdre C. Purfield, Stephen Conroy, D.P. Berry, Sean Crowley, David N Kelly
article en

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in the genetic selection of ruminants for reduced enteric methane emissions, uncertainty remains on which methane trait definitions best reflect the exploitable genetic variation independent of traits already included in national cattle breeding programs. The present study aimed to explore the genetic variability in a range of methane-related traits in growing beef cattle and quantify the proportion of genetic variance in daily methane production that is independent of performance traits such as feed intake, growth, and body size. Methane and carbon dioxide emissions were measured using GreenFeed systems on 1,700 growing crossbred beef cattle from a commercial feedlot. Performance traits, including energy intake, feeding behavior, liveweight, live animal ultrasound, subjective skeletal and muscular scores, and slaughter data were also available. Thirteen methane traits were generated, comprising daily methane production, five ratio traits, and seven residual methane production (RMP) traits, each statistically adjusted for different combinations of energy intake, liveweight, average daily gain (ADG), and carcass weight. Genetic parameters were estimated using animal linear mixed models. Daily methane production was moderately heritable (0.42 ± 0.09), with a genetic standard deviation of 23.43 g/d. Daily methane production exhibited moderate genetic correlations with feed intake (0.51), ADG (0.39), metabolic liveweight (0.27), and carcass weight (0.42). These correlations suggest commonalities in the genetic architecture between methane production and traits related to feed intake, body size and growth rate. Genetic adjustment of daily methane production for these traits resulted in a 25% reduction in the genetic standard deviation (from 23.43 g/d to 17.55 g/d), with only 56% of daily methane productions genetic variance remaining independent of the performance traits. Heritability estimates for the RMP traits ranged from 0.38 ± 0.09 to 0.46 ± 0.09, and their genetic correlations with daily methane production remained strongly positive (>0.84). These results suggest that while genetic selection can reduce methane emissions in growing beef cattle, a substantial portion of the genetic variation in daily enteric methane emissions overlaps with traits already under selection. Thus, consideration needs to be given to the genetic correlations between methane emissions and other traits already under selection when attempting to quantify the cost benefit of genetically selecting on methane emissions.

Journal of Animal Science
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE), Munster Technological University (IE), Ball (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.