Per-Trial Non-Vanishing Likelihood Divergence Under Objective Channel Reduction in Drift–Diffusion Models

This technical note examines whether likelihood divergence between full trial-level optimization and scalar accuracy-only (ACC) objective configurations in Drift–Diffusion Models (DDM) vanishes as sample size increases. Synthetic datasets are generated under fixed DDM parameters and fitted using full probabilistic likelihood. Parameter configurations constructed solely to match response accuracy proportions are evaluated under the same likelihood. Results show that: likelihood divergence scales approximately linearly with sample size, per-trial divergence remains strictly positive, divergence does not collapse under increasing N. These findings indicate systematic objective mismatch under probabilistic evaluation rather than finite-sample fluctuation. The note is strictly diagnostic. It introduces no alternative modeling framework and advances no normative claims.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18663747
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Per-Trial Non-Vanishing Likelihood Divergence Under Objective Channel Reduction in Drift–Diffusion Models

Danilo Tavella
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Per-Trial Non-Vanishing Likelihood Divergence Under Objective Channel Reduction in Drift–Diffusion Models

Danilo Tavella
article en

Abstract

This technical note examines whether likelihood divergence between full trial-level optimization and scalar accuracy-only (ACC) objective configurations in Drift–Diffusion Models (DDM) vanishes as sample size increases. Synthetic datasets are generated under fixed DDM parameters and fitted using full probabilistic likelihood. Parameter configurations constructed solely to match response accuracy proportions are evaluated under the same likelihood. Results show that: likelihood divergence scales approximately linearly with sample size, per-trial divergence remains strictly positive, divergence does not collapse under increasing N. These findings indicate systematic objective mismatch under probabilistic evaluation rather than finite-sample fluctuation. The note is strictly diagnostic. It introduces no alternative modeling framework and advances no normative claims.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.