Ultrasound-guided sharp recanalization for valve-related stenosis in the arteriovenous fistula: a single-center retrospective cohort study
To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided sharp recanalization (USR) with those of conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of venous valve-related stenosis (VVRS) in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients treated between January 2023 and June 2024. Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria; after excluding 13 patients lost to follow-up, 65 were analyzed (USR n = 33; PTA n = 32). One-to-one propensity score matching generated 32 matched pairs (USR n = 32; PTA n = 32). The primary outcome was 12-month primary patency; secondary outcomes included technical success, time to restenosis, and complications.After propensity score matching, 32 matched pairs were analyzed. In the matched cohort, 12-month primary patency was higher with USR than with PTA (62.5% vs. 25.0%; HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.18–0.70; P = 0.002). Mean time to restenosis was longer in the USR group (8.25 ± 3.42 vs. 4.48 ± 2.87 months; P = 0.021). Complications were not significantly different between groups (USR 11/32 vs. PTA 5/32), and none required open surgical intervention. USR may improve 12-month primary patency in VVRS compared with PTA without an observed increase in complications. Larger multicenter prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Authors
- Stefano E. Romero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6092-1395)
- Yi Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-0290)
- Heli Duan
- Yang Luo
- Sandra Pérez
- Zonghui Zhang
Institutions
- Sichuan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Nephrology
- Published
- 2026-02-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-04841-0
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00