CAN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS ACT AS “CO-AUDITORS”?

This study explores the integration of large language models (LLMs) into audit workflows as "co-auditors," emphasizing the necessity of embedding them within frameworks that ensure evidence traceability, governance, and human accountability. Despite growing interest in AI-augmented auditing, prior work has not systematically bridged LLM technical capabilities with audit standards and regulatory compliance requirements. Through a narrative literature review synthesizing audit doctrine, AI governance frameworks, and natural language processing research, the study examines how such integration can be achieved.Rather than substituting professional judgment, LLMs offer auditable support that enhances assurance processes. By incorporating hybrid retrieval, policy-constrained generation, and cryptographic provenance, the proposed architecture addresses both factual reliability and regulatory compliance. The findings underscore that effective LLM deployment requires strict alignment with standards. Ultimately, the research confirms that trustworthy AI in auditing depends on robust technical safeguards, governance structures, and sustained human oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Denetişim
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58348/denetisim.1782835
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS ACT AS “CO-AUDITORS”?

Hakan Emekci
Denetişim
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

CAN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS ACT AS “CO-AUDITORS”?

Hakan Emekci
article en

Abstract

This study explores the integration of large language models (LLMs) into audit workflows as "co-auditors," emphasizing the necessity of embedding them within frameworks that ensure evidence traceability, governance, and human accountability. Despite growing interest in AI-augmented auditing, prior work has not systematically bridged LLM technical capabilities with audit standards and regulatory compliance requirements. Through a narrative literature review synthesizing audit doctrine, AI governance frameworks, and natural language processing research, the study examines how such integration can be achieved.Rather than substituting professional judgment, LLMs offer auditable support that enhances assurance processes. By incorporating hybrid retrieval, policy-constrained generation, and cryptographic provenance, the proposed architecture addresses both factual reliability and regulatory compliance. The findings underscore that effective LLM deployment requires strict alignment with standards. Ultimately, the research confirms that trustworthy AI in auditing depends on robust technical safeguards, governance structures, and sustained human oversight.

Denetişim(34)
TED University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CAN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS ACT AS “CO-AUDITORS”? — Hakan Emekci · Denetişim (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS