Lithofacies Identification and Gas-Bearing Potential Evaluation of Shallow Shale Gas in China: A Case Study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Northern Guizhou

Gas-bearing potential in marine shales is governed by lithofacies-scale mineralogical heterogeneity and its coupling with organic-matter enrichment. We analyzed 40 core samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Zheng’an area, northern Guizhou (wells AD-2, AD-3, and AD-4), using whole-rock XRD, total organic carbon (w(TOC) %), and in situ gas content (cm3/g). A normalized quartz–clay–carbonate ternary diagram was applied to classify samples into siliceous shale (S), clay-rich shale (CM), calcareous shale (C), and mixed shale (M), and further into subfacies (e.g., S-1, S-2, and CM-1). Most samples plotted within the siliceous–clay transition field. Against this compositional background, w(TOC) mainly ranged from 4% to 6%, with the 4%–5% bin accounting for 57.5%; well AD-4 showed a relatively stable distribution, whereas wells AD-2 and AD-3 exhibited stronger vertical variability. In situ gas content varied systematically with lithofacies: CM displayed higher and more concentrated values (maximum 4.78 cm3/g), whereas S was more dispersed, with persistently low values in the continuous S-2 interval (minimum 0.15 cm3/g). Favorable intervals were associated with the continuous development of CM-1 and S-1, whereas S-2 required interval-specific assessment under an overall low-carbonate background.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min16020203
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lithofacies Identification and Gas-Bearing Potential Evaluation of Shallow Shale Gas in China: A Case Study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Northern Guizhou

Gangquan Li, Ming Xie, Peiyan Li, Xuan Chen et al.
1 citations
Minerals
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
18.34
article

Lithofacies Identification and Gas-Bearing Potential Evaluation of Shallow Shale Gas in China: A Case Study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Northern Guizhou

Gangquan Li, Ming Xie, Peiyan Li, Xuan Chen, Deqiang Sun, Dan Lü, Yuhao Deng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gas-bearing potential in marine shales is governed by lithofacies-scale mineralogical heterogeneity and its coupling with organic-matter enrichment. We analyzed 40 core samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Zheng’an area, northern Guizhou (wells AD-2, AD-3, and AD-4), using whole-rock XRD, total organic carbon (w(TOC) %), and in situ gas content (cm3/g). A normalized quartz–clay–carbonate ternary diagram was applied to classify samples into siliceous shale (S), clay-rich shale (CM), calcareous shale (C), and mixed shale (M), and further into subfacies (e.g., S-1, S-2, and CM-1). Most samples plotted within the siliceous–clay transition field. Against this compositional background, w(TOC) mainly ranged from 4% to 6%, with the 4%–5% bin accounting for 57.5%; well AD-4 showed a relatively stable distribution, whereas wells AD-2 and AD-3 exhibited stronger vertical variability. In situ gas content varied systematically with lithofacies: CM displayed higher and more concentrated values (maximum 4.78 cm3/g), whereas S was more dispersed, with persistently low values in the continuous S-2 interval (minimum 0.15 cm3/g). Favorable intervals were associated with the continuous development of CM-1 and S-1, whereas S-2 required interval-specific assessment under an overall low-carbonate background.

MineralsVol. 16(2)
Yangtze University (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN), Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development of Guizhou Province (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
18.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.