Impact of hydrogen blending on flow assurance assessment in subsea natural gas pipelines

Hydrogen blending into offshore natural gas pipelines is increasingly regarded as a transitional decarbonization pathway; however, its implications for deep-water subsea flow assurance remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a field-validated assessment of hydrogen–natural gas co-transport in a deep-water subsea pipeline, integrating hydraulic, thermal, corrosion, erosion, hydrate, vapor-fraction, and heat-transfer analyses within a unified modeling framework. The Atoll gas field (Eastern Mediterranean, approximately 920 m water depth) is selected as a representative case study. A 20-inch subsea production and export pipeline system is simulated using Aspen HYSYS® Version 14 and validated against High Integrity Pipeline Protection System (HIPPS) field data, with deviations below 3 %. Hydrogen blending levels ranging from 0 to 50 vol% are investigated. The results indicate that hydrogen enrichment reduces overall pressure losses and enhances vapor-phase stability due to lower mixture density, while increasing flow velocity and erosion-related parameters within acceptable operational limits. Accelerated cooling associated with hydrogen’s higher thermal conductivity increases operational hydrate risk, governed primarily by thermo-hydraulic effects rather than hydrate thermodynamics. A 50 % hydrogen blend is adopted as a conservative upper-bound scenario to examine limiting flow assurance behavior. Overall, the findings provide practical insights for offshore hydrogen blending feasibility and preliminary flow assurance screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2026.02.012
Primary Topic
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of hydrogen blending on flow assurance assessment in subsea natural gas pipelines

Ahmed S.A Soliman, Mohamed Abass Kotb, Adel A. Banawan
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
article

Impact of hydrogen blending on flow assurance assessment in subsea natural gas pipelines

Ahmed S.A Soliman, Mohamed Abass Kotb, Adel A. Banawan
article en

Abstract

Hydrogen blending into offshore natural gas pipelines is increasingly regarded as a transitional decarbonization pathway; however, its implications for deep-water subsea flow assurance remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a field-validated assessment of hydrogen–natural gas co-transport in a deep-water subsea pipeline, integrating hydraulic, thermal, corrosion, erosion, hydrate, vapor-fraction, and heat-transfer analyses within a unified modeling framework. The Atoll gas field (Eastern Mediterranean, approximately 920 m water depth) is selected as a representative case study. A 20-inch subsea production and export pipeline system is simulated using Aspen HYSYS® Version 14 and validated against High Integrity Pipeline Protection System (HIPPS) field data, with deviations below 3 %. Hydrogen blending levels ranging from 0 to 50 vol% are investigated. The results indicate that hydrogen enrichment reduces overall pressure losses and enhances vapor-phase stability due to lower mixture density, while increasing flow velocity and erosion-related parameters within acceptable operational limits. Accelerated cooling associated with hydrogen’s higher thermal conductivity increases operational hydrate risk, governed primarily by thermo-hydraulic effects rather than hydrate thermodynamics. A 50 % hydrogen blend is adopted as a conservative upper-bound scenario to examine limiting flow assurance behavior. Overall, the findings provide practical insights for offshore hydrogen blending feasibility and preliminary flow assurance screening.

Alexandria Engineering JournalVol. 139
Alexandria University (EG)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.