Clinical effects and safety of proximal femur bionic nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation or InterTAN for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

For the treatment of IFF , the PFBN is more effective and has a lower risk than the PFNA and InterTAN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20801
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical effects and safety of proximal femur bionic nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation or InterTAN for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Feilong Lu, Yimei Hu, Yulin Ma, Hao Song et al.
PeerJ
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Clinical effects and safety of proximal femur bionic nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation or InterTAN for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Feilong Lu, Yimei Hu, Yulin Ma, Hao Song, Zhaoxi Yang, Wenbin Zhang, Xiaoming Du
article en

Abstract

For the treatment of IFF , the PFBN is more effective and has a lower risk than the PFNA and InterTAN.

PeerJVol. 14
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.