Betraying the Dream (Machine): NET, the FBI, and Regulating Public Television Content in the 1970s

This article investigates the history of content regulation in the US public television sector. It analyzes the context and consequences of an October 1971 decision by the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) to remove a segment from National Educational Television’s (NET) popular series The Great American Dream Machine that alleged the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had recruited young men to infiltrate student groups and engage in violent acts. The controversy that followed PBS’s decision both exposed fissures and resolved conflicts over who would have the authority to determine the contours and politics of public television programing. This moment, as this article illustrates, also spoke to an escalating shift in the press’s relationship to the government, particularly the FBI, and the uncertainty of publicly funded television’s contribution to adversarial journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Television & New Media
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764261418011
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Betraying the Dream (Machine): NET, the FBI, and Regulating Public Television Content in the 1970s

Allison Perlman
Television & New Media
Media Studies and Communication
article

Betraying the Dream (Machine): NET, the FBI, and Regulating Public Television Content in the 1970s

Allison Perlman
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the history of content regulation in the US public television sector. It analyzes the context and consequences of an October 1971 decision by the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) to remove a segment from National Educational Television’s (NET) popular series The Great American Dream Machine that alleged the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had recruited young men to infiltrate student groups and engage in violent acts. The controversy that followed PBS’s decision both exposed fissures and resolved conflicts over who would have the authority to determine the contours and politics of public television programing. This moment, as this article illustrates, also spoke to an escalating shift in the press’s relationship to the government, particularly the FBI, and the uncertainty of publicly funded television’s contribution to adversarial journalism.

Television & New Media
University of California, Irvine (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.