Computational Investigation on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low-Aspect-Ratio NACA 4412 Wings in Low-Re Flows: Comparative Study on CFD and Panel Methods

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation and comparison on the performances of the vortex lattice method (VLM), the 3D-panel method (PM), and the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and large-eddy simulation (LES) in predicting aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wings in low-Reynolds number flows. The primary aim is to investigate the capability of the models in capturing separation bubbles and complex flow behaviors with a particular focus on a wide range of high angles of attack. Accordingly, the low-aspect-ratio (AR = 1 and AR = 3) wings with a well-known NACA 4412 airfoil have been modelled and investigated at the Reynolds numbers 2.5 × 104 and 7.5 × 104 using the aforementioned methods to make a comparison on lift and drag prediction capabilities. The grid independence studies are conducted for both methods and ensure that the results are independent of the number of mesh or panel elements. Initially, the results of VLM and PM are compared with the RANS CFD analysis results carried out using k–kL–ω transition turbulence model. The further analyses are performed using various turbulence models (RNG k–ε, transition SST, k–kL–ω transition, realizable k–ε models), and the results are compared with large-eddy simulation (LES) analyses and the experimental wind tunnel data available in literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluid Dynamics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0015462825602712
Primary Topic
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Investigation on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low-Aspect-Ratio NACA 4412 Wings in Low-Re Flows: Comparative Study on CFD and Panel Methods

Ahmet Şumnu, Yüksel ERASLAN
Fluid Dynamics
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
article

Computational Investigation on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low-Aspect-Ratio NACA 4412 Wings in Low-Re Flows: Comparative Study on CFD and Panel Methods

Ahmet Şumnu, Yüksel ERASLAN
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation and comparison on the performances of the vortex lattice method (VLM), the 3D-panel method (PM), and the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and large-eddy simulation (LES) in predicting aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wings in low-Reynolds number flows. The primary aim is to investigate the capability of the models in capturing separation bubbles and complex flow behaviors with a particular focus on a wide range of high angles of attack. Accordingly, the low-aspect-ratio (AR = 1 and AR = 3) wings with a well-known NACA 4412 airfoil have been modelled and investigated at the Reynolds numbers 2.5 × 104 and 7.5 × 104 using the aforementioned methods to make a comparison on lift and drag prediction capabilities. The grid independence studies are conducted for both methods and ensure that the results are independent of the number of mesh or panel elements. Initially, the results of VLM and PM are compared with the RANS CFD analysis results carried out using k–kL–ω transition turbulence model. The further analyses are performed using various turbulence models (RNG k–ε, transition SST, k–kL–ω transition, realizable k–ε models), and the results are compared with large-eddy simulation (LES) analyses and the experimental wind tunnel data available in literature.

Fluid DynamicsVol. 60(8)
Tarsus University (TR), İskenderun Technical University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.