A comprehensive review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare methods, evaluation, and clinical integration

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is essential for healthcare trust, yet a substantial gap persists between XAI techniques and actual clinical adoption. This review addresses this gap by framing clinical integration through three complementary lenses. First, we introduce a three-dimensional XAI classification framework-property, dependency, and scope-that moves beyond descriptive cataloging and serves as a practical guide for matching XAI approaches to specific clinical tasks. Second, we propose an integrated evaluation system that balances technical robustness, including fidelity, with measures of clinical utility such as workflow alignment and clinician confidence. Third, we analyze the divergent and often competing needs of key stakeholder groups to produce a role-characteristic mapping that clarifies what constitutes meaningful explainability in different clinical contexts. By positioning clinical integration as the center, this review outlines a pathway for translating XAI from methodological innovation to a dependable component of clinical decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115026
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare methods, evaluation, and clinical integration

Fuxin Lin, Jue Xie, Kai Zhang, Dongqi Wang et al.
iScience
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

A comprehensive review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare methods, evaluation, and clinical integration

Fuxin Lin, Jue Xie, Kai Zhang, Dongqi Wang, Weihua Zhou
article en

Abstract

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is essential for healthcare trust, yet a substantial gap persists between XAI techniques and actual clinical adoption. This review addresses this gap by framing clinical integration through three complementary lenses. First, we introduce a three-dimensional XAI classification framework-property, dependency, and scope-that moves beyond descriptive cataloging and serves as a practical guide for matching XAI approaches to specific clinical tasks. Second, we propose an integrated evaluation system that balances technical robustness, including fidelity, with measures of clinical utility such as workflow alignment and clinician confidence. Third, we analyze the divergent and often competing needs of key stakeholder groups to produce a role-characteristic mapping that clarifies what constitutes meaningful explainability in different clinical contexts. By positioning clinical integration as the center, this review outlines a pathway for translating XAI from methodological innovation to a dependable component of clinical decision support.

iScienceVol. 29(3)
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Zhejiang Lab (CN), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.