Deprivation or Dominance? Examining the Psychological Antecedents of Historical Negation Among Europeans Over Time

Although historical negation-the ideologically-based denial of the contemporary relevance of colonial injustices-sustains inequities between settler colonisers and Indigenous peoples, few studies explore the psychological processes underlying historical negation among settler colonisers. In this pre-registered study, we examine whether perceived group-based relative deprivation (GRD) fosters historical negation among New Zealand Europeans. To do so, we use seven annual waves of data from a nationwide panel sample of New Zealand European adults (<i>N</i> = 26,759) and random intercept cross-lagged panel modelling to predict within-person changes in historical negation over time. Contrary to our hypotheses, no significant within-person associations emerged between GRD and historical negation. GRD did, however, have a positive between-person association with historical negation among sole-identifying New Zealand Europeans. These results indicate that GRD among settler colonisers correlates with-but does not drive-the minimisation of the present-day relevance of colonial injustices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261419543
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deprivation or Dominance? Examining the Psychological Antecedents of Historical Negation Among Europeans Over Time

Kieren J. Lilly, Tamino Konur, Zoe Bertenshaw, Chris G Sibley et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Deprivation or Dominance? Examining the Psychological Antecedents of Historical Negation Among Europeans Over Time

Kieren J. Lilly, Tamino Konur, Zoe Bertenshaw, Chris G Sibley, Chantelle Kimberley, Danny Osborne
article en

Abstract

Although historical negation-the ideologically-based denial of the contemporary relevance of colonial injustices-sustains inequities between settler colonisers and Indigenous peoples, few studies explore the psychological processes underlying historical negation among settler colonisers. In this pre-registered study, we examine whether perceived group-based relative deprivation (GRD) fosters historical negation among New Zealand Europeans. To do so, we use seven annual waves of data from a nationwide panel sample of New Zealand European adults (<i>N</i> = 26,759) and random intercept cross-lagged panel modelling to predict within-person changes in historical negation over time. Contrary to our hypotheses, no significant within-person associations emerged between GRD and historical negation. GRD did, however, have a positive between-person association with historical negation among sole-identifying New Zealand Europeans. These results indicate that GRD among settler colonisers correlates with-but does not drive-the minimisation of the present-day relevance of colonial injustices.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Kent (GB)
University of Cambridge, Templeton Religion Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.