Heat tolerance classification criteria require population‐specific thresholds for accurate assessment of acclimation state in adults

Heat tolerance testing (HTT) assesses responses to heat stress with rectal temperature (T<sub>rec</sub>) and heart rate (HR) thresholds defining individuals as heat-tolerant (HT) or heat-intolerant (HI). To evaluate classification criteria by acclimation state and sex. Forty participants (19M/21F, mean ± SD, 23 ± 4 years) completed an HTT (120 min, 5 km·h<sup>-1</sup>, 2% grade) before (PreHA) and after (PostHA) 5 days of repeated exercise in (40°C, 40% RH) categorized as isothermal (exercise intensity adjusted to maintain T<sub>rec</sub> within 38.5°C-39.5°C, 60 min) exercise-heat acclimation (HA). Females had lower body surface area (vs. males) (1.7 ± 0.1 vs. 2.0 ± 0.2 m<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001), mass (59.5 ± 5.4 vs. 79.5 ± 10.1 kg, p < 0.001), height (164.2 ± 5.7 vs. 179.1 ± 7.6 cm, p < 0.001), maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2</sub>max, 44.5 ± 5.1 vs. 51.5 ± 5.7 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001), and velocity at V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (12.9 ± 1.5 vs. 15.0 ± 1.7 km·h<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001). PreHA 51.1% (mean % HI classification across criteria) of participants were HI (66.7% F/52.6% M), decreasing (p < 0.001) to 23.6% PostHA (28.6% F/10.5% M), reflected across criteria (p < 0.05). The rate of HI based on plateau in T<sub>rec</sub> during the final 60 min (ΔT<sub>rec (T120-T60)</sub> ≥ 0.45°C) was similar (p = 0.735) PreHA (15% HI) and PostHA (10%), and HA reduced ΔT<sub>rec (T120-T60)</sub> (0.30 ± 0.19 vs. 0.19 ± 0.20°C, p = 0.001), demonstrating sensitivity to adaptation. HA reduces HI classification rate, but criteria differ in capturing presumed HT and classify more females as HI in naïve and acclimated states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Reports
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70745
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heat tolerance classification criteria require population‐specific thresholds for accurate assessment of acclimation state in adults

Jacob Bowie, Jeb F. Struder, Gabrielle J. Brewer, Elaine Lee et al.
Physiological Reports
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Heat tolerance classification criteria require population‐specific thresholds for accurate assessment of acclimation state in adults

Jacob Bowie, Jeb F. Struder, Gabrielle J. Brewer, Elaine Lee, Oh Sung Kwon, Michael R. Szymanski, Yasuki Sekiguchi, Staci N. Thornton, Erica M. Filep, Margaret C. Morrissey‐Basler, Douglas J. Casa, Kyle Mahoney, Ki H. Chon
article en

Abstract

Heat tolerance testing (HTT) assesses responses to heat stress with rectal temperature (T<sub>rec</sub>) and heart rate (HR) thresholds defining individuals as heat-tolerant (HT) or heat-intolerant (HI). To evaluate classification criteria by acclimation state and sex. Forty participants (19M/21F, mean ± SD, 23 ± 4 years) completed an HTT (120 min, 5 km·h<sup>-1</sup>, 2% grade) before (PreHA) and after (PostHA) 5 days of repeated exercise in (40°C, 40% RH) categorized as isothermal (exercise intensity adjusted to maintain T<sub>rec</sub> within 38.5°C-39.5°C, 60 min) exercise-heat acclimation (HA). Females had lower body surface area (vs. males) (1.7 ± 0.1 vs. 2.0 ± 0.2 m<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001), mass (59.5 ± 5.4 vs. 79.5 ± 10.1 kg, p < 0.001), height (164.2 ± 5.7 vs. 179.1 ± 7.6 cm, p < 0.001), maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2</sub>max, 44.5 ± 5.1 vs. 51.5 ± 5.7 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001), and velocity at V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (12.9 ± 1.5 vs. 15.0 ± 1.7 km·h<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001). PreHA 51.1% (mean % HI classification across criteria) of participants were HI (66.7% F/52.6% M), decreasing (p < 0.001) to 23.6% PostHA (28.6% F/10.5% M), reflected across criteria (p < 0.05). The rate of HI based on plateau in T<sub>rec</sub> during the final 60 min (ΔT<sub>rec (T120-T60)</sub> ≥ 0.45°C) was similar (p = 0.735) PreHA (15% HI) and PostHA (10%), and HA reduced ΔT<sub>rec (T120-T60)</sub> (0.30 ± 0.19 vs. 0.19 ± 0.20°C, p = 0.001), demonstrating sensitivity to adaptation. HA reduces HI classification rate, but criteria differ in capturing presumed HT and classify more females as HI in naïve and acclimated states.

Physiological ReportsVol. 14(4)
University of Connecticut (US)
U.S. Department of Defense
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.