Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain

The aims of this study were to investigate the intra-rater reliability of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in people with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to compare nervous system function between these groups, using a case-control design. We sought people with and without PFP to participate in PNS and TMS testing to calculate maximal compound motor action potential, maximal force, voluntary activation (VA), active motor threshold (AMT), corticospinal excitability (CSE), silent period, and short-interval intracortical inhibition. People with PFP also rated their current pain and function. Single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals were used to determine intra-rater reliability, with standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change calculated. Between-group differences in PNS and TMS variables were determined using Student's two-tailed, independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. Twenty-seven people without and 23 people with PFP completed PNS and TMS testing. For intra-rater reliability, 18 people without and 17 people with PFP returned for a second testing session, and intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from good to excellent (0.62-0.96). People with PFP demonstrated significantly lower VA (P < 0.0001), higher AMT (P = 0.014) and lower CSE (P = 0.018). In conclusion, both PNS and TMS demonstrate acceptable intra-rater reliability in people with and without PFP. Elevated AMT and reduced CSE indicate that people with PFP might have a hypoexcitable motor cortex-corticospinal pathway, and lower VA indicates reduced recruitment of high-threshold motor units. These findings indicate that a neurophysiological mechanism might underpin the poor prognosis of PFP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Physiology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/ep093432
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain

Jamie Tallent, Nelson Cortés, Aleksandra V. Birn‐Jeffery, Xuerong Shao et al.
Experimental Physiology
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain

Jamie Tallent, Nelson Cortés, Aleksandra V. Birn‐Jeffery, Xuerong Shao, Manali Akre, Bradley Stephen Neal, Fawei Deng, Bernard Xian Wei Liew, Emily Finch, Jia Han
article en

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the intra-rater reliability of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in people with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to compare nervous system function between these groups, using a case-control design. We sought people with and without PFP to participate in PNS and TMS testing to calculate maximal compound motor action potential, maximal force, voluntary activation (VA), active motor threshold (AMT), corticospinal excitability (CSE), silent period, and short-interval intracortical inhibition. People with PFP also rated their current pain and function. Single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals were used to determine intra-rater reliability, with standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change calculated. Between-group differences in PNS and TMS variables were determined using Student's two-tailed, independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. Twenty-seven people without and 23 people with PFP completed PNS and TMS testing. For intra-rater reliability, 18 people without and 17 people with PFP returned for a second testing session, and intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from good to excellent (0.62-0.96). People with PFP demonstrated significantly lower VA (P < 0.0001), higher AMT (P = 0.014) and lower CSE (P = 0.018). In conclusion, both PNS and TMS demonstrate acceptable intra-rater reliability in people with and without PFP. Elevated AMT and reduced CSE indicate that people with PFP might have a hypoexcitable motor cortex-corticospinal pathway, and lower VA indicates reduced recruitment of high-threshold motor units. These findings indicate that a neurophysiological mechanism might underpin the poor prognosis of PFP.

Experimental Physiology
University of Essex (GB), George Mason University (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Monash Health (AU), Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences (CN), Monash University (AU)
University of Essex
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.