Distinct Second Primary Tumor Phenotypes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma According to Exposure Status and Immune Background

<b>Background</b>: Second primary tumors (SPTs) are a major survivorship challenge in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), yet their biological phenotypes may differ according to exposure status and immune background. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective cohort (2011-2020), 242 surgically treated primary OSCC patients were classified as non-smoking, non-drinking (NSND; never smokers/never drinkers) or smoking and/or drinking (SD; any history of smoking and/or alcohol consumption). SPTs were categorized as extra-oral SPTs (eoSPTs) or multifocal oral SCC (mOSCC), with mOSCC (≥3) denoting ≥3 oral primaries. Immune background was assessed by documenting immune-modulating conditions (including oral lichen planus as an immune-mediated mucosal disorder). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of eoSPTs and mOSCC. <b>Results</b>: SPT occurred in 82/242 (33.9%), comprising 54 eoSPT (22.3%) and 28 mOSCC (11.6%). Overall SPT prevalence was similar in NSND and SD patients (29.8% vs. 36.1%), but phenotype composition differed significantly (chi-square <i>p</i> = 0.004): eoSPTs were more common in SD (27.8% vs. 11.9%), whereas mOSCC was more common in NSND (17.9% vs. 8.2%); mOSCC (≥3) occurred in 10.7% of NSND versus 1.3% of SD patients. Immune-modulating conditions were associated with mOSCC but not eoSPTs. Within the immune-modulating spectrum, OLP showed strong phenotype specificity (0/20 eoSPTs; mOSCC in 7/20 [35.0%), particularly among NSND patients (38.9% with OLP vs. 12.1% without). In adjusted models, NSND status was associated with lower odds of eoSPT (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.96), while OLP independently predicted mOSCC (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.04-11.52). <b>Conclusions</b>: SPTs in OSCC comprise distinct phenotypes: SD patients predominantly develop eoSPTs consistent with carcinogen-associated aerodigestive field effects, whereas NSND patients exhibit an immune-associated, oral-restricted pattern with frequent mOSCC, supporting phenotype-tailored surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041563
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct Second Primary Tumor Phenotypes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma According to Exposure Status and Immune Background

Igor Čvrljević, Koraljka Hat, M. Raguz, Ivica Lukšić et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Distinct Second Primary Tumor Phenotypes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma According to Exposure Status and Immune Background

Igor Čvrljević, Koraljka Hat, M. Raguz, Ivica Lukšić, Marko Tarle, Ivan Salarić
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Second primary tumors (SPTs) are a major survivorship challenge in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), yet their biological phenotypes may differ according to exposure status and immune background. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective cohort (2011-2020), 242 surgically treated primary OSCC patients were classified as non-smoking, non-drinking (NSND; never smokers/never drinkers) or smoking and/or drinking (SD; any history of smoking and/or alcohol consumption). SPTs were categorized as extra-oral SPTs (eoSPTs) or multifocal oral SCC (mOSCC), with mOSCC (≥3) denoting ≥3 oral primaries. Immune background was assessed by documenting immune-modulating conditions (including oral lichen planus as an immune-mediated mucosal disorder). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of eoSPTs and mOSCC. <b>Results</b>: SPT occurred in 82/242 (33.9%), comprising 54 eoSPT (22.3%) and 28 mOSCC (11.6%). Overall SPT prevalence was similar in NSND and SD patients (29.8% vs. 36.1%), but phenotype composition differed significantly (chi-square <i>p</i> = 0.004): eoSPTs were more common in SD (27.8% vs. 11.9%), whereas mOSCC was more common in NSND (17.9% vs. 8.2%); mOSCC (≥3) occurred in 10.7% of NSND versus 1.3% of SD patients. Immune-modulating conditions were associated with mOSCC but not eoSPTs. Within the immune-modulating spectrum, OLP showed strong phenotype specificity (0/20 eoSPTs; mOSCC in 7/20 [35.0%), particularly among NSND patients (38.9% with OLP vs. 12.1% without). In adjusted models, NSND status was associated with lower odds of eoSPT (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.96), while OLP independently predicted mOSCC (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.04-11.52). <b>Conclusions</b>: SPTs in OSCC comprise distinct phenotypes: SD patients predominantly develop eoSPTs consistent with carcinogen-associated aerodigestive field effects, whereas NSND patients exhibit an immune-associated, oral-restricted pattern with frequent mOSCC, supporting phenotype-tailored surveillance.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
University of Zagreb (HR), University Hospital Dubrava (HR), Catholic University of Croatia (HR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.