Routine Estimation of the Prospect of Individual Forecasts and Their Efficiency

One of the main tasks facing the Kamchatka Branch of the Russian Expert Council on Earthquake Prediction and Seismic Risk Assessment (KB REC) is to evaluate submitted forecasts of large earthquakes. The experience at the KB REC showed that forecasts predicting the future evolution of a seismicity situation submitted by researchers very frequently contain merely some individual elements necessary for prediction, which is clearly insufficient. Examination of such forecasts is difficult, and occasionally outright impossible, which complicates the use of such data in the analysis of seismicity situations and the development of a comprehensive forecast evaluation. While the evaluation of the success of a forecast causes no difficulty to a first approximation, a preliminary (at the time the forecast is submitted) evaluation of the quality of a forecast in any form is frequently difficult. This especially concerns novel or recently developed prediction procedures, that is, procedures without a “history” at the KB REC. It is such forecasts which constitute the object of this study. The tasks we set ourselves to resolve are (1) developing a procedure applicable to the evaluation of a forecast at the time it is submitted, including the estimation of the probability of random occurrence, (2) estimation of the success of a forecast when any statistics based on the use of this particular prediction procedure is absent. This paper presents the approaches used at the KB REC for routine evaluation of the success of a forecast and/or precursors. All parameters used to evaluate prediction procedures and their practical application are formalized and possess clear physical meaning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0742046325700472
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine Estimation of the Prospect of Individual Forecasts and Their Efficiency

D. V. Chebrov, V. A. Saltykov
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Routine Estimation of the Prospect of Individual Forecasts and Their Efficiency

D. V. Chebrov, V. A. Saltykov
article en

Abstract

One of the main tasks facing the Kamchatka Branch of the Russian Expert Council on Earthquake Prediction and Seismic Risk Assessment (KB REC) is to evaluate submitted forecasts of large earthquakes. The experience at the KB REC showed that forecasts predicting the future evolution of a seismicity situation submitted by researchers very frequently contain merely some individual elements necessary for prediction, which is clearly insufficient. Examination of such forecasts is difficult, and occasionally outright impossible, which complicates the use of such data in the analysis of seismicity situations and the development of a comprehensive forecast evaluation. While the evaluation of the success of a forecast causes no difficulty to a first approximation, a preliminary (at the time the forecast is submitted) evaluation of the quality of a forecast in any form is frequently difficult. This especially concerns novel or recently developed prediction procedures, that is, procedures without a “history” at the KB REC. It is such forecasts which constitute the object of this study. The tasks we set ourselves to resolve are (1) developing a procedure applicable to the evaluation of a forecast at the time it is submitted, including the estimation of the probability of random occurrence, (2) estimation of the success of a forecast when any statistics based on the use of this particular prediction procedure is absent. This paper presents the approaches used at the KB REC for routine evaluation of the success of a forecast and/or precursors. All parameters used to evaluate prediction procedures and their practical application are formalized and possess clear physical meaning.

Journal of Volcanology and SeismologyVol. 19(S1)
Geophysical Survey (RU), Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.