Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia

Achieving policy change in complex governance systems remains a persistent challenge, particularly where transformative integration is needed but institutional resistance is strong. This paper introduces policy fit as a novel approach comprising three dimensions: structural compatibility, shared understanding, and systemic responsiveness. Through analysis of Australia’s attempts at integrated ocean management (IOM); Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) and Australia’s Oceans Policy (AOP), we demonstrate how policy fit serves as both a diagnostic tool for identifying barriers to effective change and a design principle for achieving meaningful integration within existing constraints. These cases reveal that ambitious policies lacking alignment across the three dimensions inevitably encounter insurmountable resistance from entrenched institutions, cognitive fragmentation, and veto points. Policy fit offers practitioners a strategic incrementalist pathway that works with, rather than against, existing governance structures, enabling sustainable integration through calculated alignment rather than wholesale institutional restructuring. This approach represents a vital alternative to transformative policies that encounter insurmountable institutional resistance, offering instead a pragmatic path toward sustainable policy change in complex systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Sciences
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-026-09602-2
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia

Joanna Vince, Liam Fullbrook
Policy Sciences
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia

Joanna Vince, Liam Fullbrook
article en

Abstract

Achieving policy change in complex governance systems remains a persistent challenge, particularly where transformative integration is needed but institutional resistance is strong. This paper introduces policy fit as a novel approach comprising three dimensions: structural compatibility, shared understanding, and systemic responsiveness. Through analysis of Australia’s attempts at integrated ocean management (IOM); Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) and Australia’s Oceans Policy (AOP), we demonstrate how policy fit serves as both a diagnostic tool for identifying barriers to effective change and a design principle for achieving meaningful integration within existing constraints. These cases reveal that ambitious policies lacking alignment across the three dimensions inevitably encounter insurmountable resistance from entrenched institutions, cognitive fragmentation, and veto points. Policy fit offers practitioners a strategic incrementalist pathway that works with, rather than against, existing governance structures, enabling sustainable integration through calculated alignment rather than wholesale institutional restructuring. This approach represents a vital alternative to transformative policies that encounter insurmountable institutional resistance, offering instead a pragmatic path toward sustainable policy change in complex systems.

Policy SciencesVol. 59(1)
University of Tasmania (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.